[2021] KEHC 1171 (KLR)
The court held that the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu, which allowed for re-sentencing in murder cases with mandatory death sentences, does not extend to the offence of robbery with violence. The Supreme Court clarified that its decision is limited to murder cases under Sections 203 and 204...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 1171 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Danson Ngare Nyaga; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Petition 1 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Judges
- JK Mulwa, RM Mwongo
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Sentencing Guidelines, Mandatory Sentences
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Danson Ngare Nyaga
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu applies to re-sentencing for the offence of robbery with violence.
- 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to a sentence re-hearing in light of the Supreme Court guidelines.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu, which allowed for re-sentencing in murder cases with mandatory death sentences, does not extend to the offence of robbery with violence. The Supreme Court clarified that its decision is limited to murder cases under Sections 203 and 204 of the Penal Code. Consequently, the High Court is prohibited from entertaining sentence re-hearing applications for robbery with violence convictions. The petitioner's application for re-sentencing is therefore not tenable and must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- The petition for sentence re-hearing is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT AT KERUGOYA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1 OF 2018
(From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No. 771 of 2007 Kerugoya Law Court, Criminal Appeal. No 117 of 2008 Kerugoya High Court & Criminal Appeal No. 27 of 2010 Nyeri High Court)
DANSON NGARE NYAGA..............................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
REPUBLIC.......................................................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner Danson Ngare Nyagah was convicted for the offence of Robbery with Violence Contrary to Section 296 (2) of the Penal Codeon the 22. 2.2008 and sentenced to suffer death.
He filed appeals to this court vide Kerugoya High Court Criminal Appeal No. 117 of 2008, and Court of Appeal at Nyeri 27 of 2010 – which were dismissed.
2. By his Petition filed on the 4. 5.2018 seeking for sentence re-hearing pursuant to the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another V. Republic (2015), (2017) @KLR
He is now serving life sentence after his sentence was commuted by the President.
3. The petitioner filed his mitigation on the 5. 3.2020, and urged the court to also consider the period he was in custody during the hearing of the case.
The prosecution did not file any submissions but was duly represented at all times.
4. This is one of those many applications for re-sentence hearing that have been overtaken by events as the decision in the Francis Karioko Muruatetu decision (Supra) no longer apply in Robbery with Violence cases, among others.
5. On the 6. 7.2021, the Supreme Court while giving guidelines and directions on the application of its judgment in the Muruatetu decision (Supra) rendered itself that the said decision delivered on the 14. 12. 2017 does not apply to all offences with mandatory minimum sentences but applies ONLYto the offence and sentence of Murder under Section 203 and 204 of the Penal Code.
That without a doubt excludes the offence of Robbery with Violence.
This court is therefore prohibited from entertaining sentence re-hearing, save for, and in respect of the offence of murder, for the time being
6. In the circumstances, the petition hereto cannot be entertained. It is dismissed.
DATED AND SIGNED THIS………….….…DAY OF…………….…….2021
J. N. MULWA
JUDGE
DATED AND DELIVERED AT KERUGOYA THIS 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021
R. M. MWONGO
JUDGE