[2018] KEELC 1869 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 1869 (KLR)

The court held that the Marimanti Law Court's jurisdiction was not in dispute and that the applicant's reasons for seeking transfer—namely, personal inconvenience due to distance, ill health, and fear of violence—were not substantiated or sufficient to warrant transfer. The court found that generalized assertions...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 1869 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Danson Njogu Kibicho; Respondent: Karigi Muchui; Respondent: Peter Mwangangi Mutea; Respondent: Angelina Kaithi Kanake; Respondent: Lydia Kanake Kobiah; Respondent: Purity Kanini M’Ngoci
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 6 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Transfer of Suit, Jurisdiction of Court, Expeditious Hearing, Forum Conveniens
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Transfer of Suit Jurisdiction of Court Expeditious Hearing Forum Conveniens

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Danson Njogu Kibicho

Applicant

Karigi Muchui

Respondent

Peter Mwangangi Mutea

Respondent

Angelina Kaithi Kanake

Respondent

Lydia Kanake Kobiah

Respondent

Purity Kanini M’Ngoci

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit

  1. 1 Whether the Marimanti Law Court has jurisdiction to hear the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient grounds for transfer of the suit from Marimanti to Chuka or Meru.
  3. 3 Whether inconvenience or perceived insecurity justifies transfer of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Marimanti Law Court's jurisdiction was not in dispute and that the applicant's reasons for seeking transfer—namely, personal inconvenience due to distance, ill health, and fear of violence—were not substantiated or sufficient to warrant transfer. The court found that generalized assertions about the volatility of the local population amounted to profiling and could not form a legal basis for transfer. The court emphasized that the age of the suit, while a concern, was not a reason to move the case, but rather to proceed expeditiously at the court with proper jurisdiction. The application was therefore dismissed, and the suit was to proceed at Marimanti Law Court.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for transfer of Marimanti Civil Case Number 22 of 2018 is summarily dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.