[2008] KEHC 1392 (KLR)
The court determined that due to the existence of contested facts regarding the ownership and transfer of the suit property, and the lack of clear evidence such as minutes authorizing the sale by the church, the matter could not be resolved on affidavit evidence alone. The court held that the suit should proceed by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 1392 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Darasa Investments Limited; Defendant: Mark Ngaina; Defendant: George Kanyuria Chege; Defendant: The Good News Church of Africa (Registered Trustees); Defendant: The Gospel Furthering Bible Church Trust (Registered Trustees)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 274 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Directions for Hearing Procedure
- Outcome
- Directions issued for suit to proceed by viva voce evidence after compliance with Order 11A (I) of the Civil Procedure Rules; suit ought to be brought by plaint.
- Judges
- JL Osiemo
- Legal Topics
- Title to Land, Eviction, Mesne Profits, Trespass, Procedure for Hearing, Originating Summons
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Darasa Investments Limited
Plaintiff
Mark Ngaina
Defendant
George Kanyuria Chege
Defendant
The Good News Church of Africa (Registered Trustees)
Defendant
The Gospel Furthering Bible Church Trust (Registered Trustees)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Directions for Hearing Procedure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is the lawful registered owner of LR No.36(VII) 586 IR 23941.
- 2 Whether the continued occupation by the defendants constitutes unlawful trespass.
- 3 Whether the suit should proceed by affidavit evidence or viva voce evidence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that due to the existence of contested facts regarding the ownership and transfer of the suit property, and the lack of clear evidence such as minutes authorizing the sale by the church, the matter could not be resolved on affidavit evidence alone. The court held that the suit should proceed by way of viva voce evidence to allow for proper examination and cross-examination of witnesses. Furthermore, the court noted that the suit ought to have been brought by way of plaint rather than originating summons, given the complexity and nature of the dispute.
Court Disposition
Directions issued for suit to proceed by viva voce evidence after compliance with Order 11A (I) of the Civil Procedure Rules; suit ought to be brought by plaint.
Orders
- The suit shall proceed by way of viva voce evidence.
- Parties to comply with the provisions of Order 11A (I) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
ELC Case 274 of 2008
DARASA INVESTMENTS LIMITED…..……….………..PLAINTIFF
AND
MARK NGAINA
GEORGE KANYUIRA CHEGE
Sued as the Registered Trustees of
THE GOOD NEWS CHURCH OF AFRICA and
THE GOSPEL FURTHERING BIBLE CHURCH TRUST
(Registered Trustees)……………………………….DEFENDANTS
R U L I N G
Before me is an application by way of a Chamber Summons dated 12th June 2008 and amended on 26th June 2008 brought under Order XXXVI Rule 8A and 12 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act in which the plaintiff seeks orders that this court do give directions in the manner in which this suit should proceed as to whether evidence should be led by way of affidavit or viva voce. These proceedings were originated by originating summons filed on 9th July 2008 by Darasa Investments Limited seeking a declaration that the plaintiff herein is the lawful Registered owner of the suit property being LR No.36(VII) 586 IR 23941 and the continued occupation of the said parcel of land by the defendants is unlawful and the same constitutes illegal trespass; that the defendants be evicted from the said parcel of land being LR NO. 36 (VII) 586 IR23941 situated in Eastleigh in Nairobi; that the defendants do pay mesne profits for the continued occupation of the suit property from the 20th July 2007 until the final determination of the summons and that the defendants do bear the costs of this application.
The facts which gave rise to this litigation briefly may be stated. The President of the Republic of Kenya issued a grant to THE GOSPEL FURTHERING FELLOWSHIP REGISTERED TRUSTEE, a body corporate duly established under the provisions of the Land (Perpetual Succession Act Chapter 286) Post Office Box Number 1141 Nairobi herein called “the Grantee” ALL that piece of land situated in the City of Nairobi containing by measurement 2. 501 Ha being LR No.36/VII/586. By a transfer Agreement between THE TRUSTEES OF THE GOSPEL FURTHERING BIBLE CHURCH AND THE TRUSTEES OF GOOD NEWS CHURCH OF AFRICA AND DARASA INVESTMENTS LIMITED at a consideration of Kshs.42,000,000/=. The transfer was signed by MARK NGAIRA and GEORGE KANYUIRA CHEGE on behalf of THE GOSPEL FURTHERING FELLOWSHIP REGISTERED TRUSTEES and HILLOWLY IBRAHIM NOOR and ALI MUSA MOHAMMED on behalf of DARASA INVESTMENTS LIMITED but the names of the Trustees for THE TRUSTEES OF THE GOOD NEWS CHURCH OF AFRICA are not indicated alongside the photos.
Seemingly as gathered from the affidavit evidence the defendants never vacated the suit premises. The defendants being a church, a body of corporate duty established under the provisions Land (Perpetual Succession) Act there should be evidence to minutes where the congregation passed a resolution to sell the church together with its buildings. Further the grant was issued by the President to THE GOSPEL FURTHERING FELLOWSHIP REGISTERED TRUSTEES but in this suit the defendants include THE GOOD NEWS CHURCH OF AFRICA and the transfer is not accompanied with the Agreement. In view of the above, I give directions that this suit do proceed by way of viva voce evidence after compliance with the provisions of Order 11A (I) of the Civil Procedure Rules and the suit ought to be brought by way of a plaint.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 17th day of October 2008.
J. L. A. OSIEMO
JUDGE