[2020] KEELRC 1873 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 1873 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was injured in the course of his employment, and that the degree of permanent incapacity and the quantum of damages had been duly assessed by the County Occupational Health and Safety Officer. As the respondent failed to contest the assessment or the application, the court accepted...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELRC 1873 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Daud Nur Haji; Respondent: Wajir County Assembly Service Board
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Cause 50 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
AN Makau
Legal Topics
Workplace Injury, Compensation for Injury, Permanent Incapacity, Employer Liability
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Tort Law Workplace Injury Compensation for Injury Permanent Incapacity Employer Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daud Nur Haji

Claimant

Wajir County Assembly Service Board

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for injuries sustained in the course of employment.
  2. 2 Whether the assessment of permanent incapacity and quantum of damages by the Occupational Health and Safety Officer is binding on the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was injured in the course of his employment, and that the degree of permanent incapacity and the quantum of damages had been duly assessed by the County Occupational Health and Safety Officer. As the respondent failed to contest the assessment or the application, the court accepted the assessment as conclusive and entered judgment in favour of the claimant for the assessed sum, plus costs and interest. The court emphasized that uncontested expert assessments and unopposed applications warrant judgment as prayed, provided procedural requirements are met.

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the claimant for Kshs. 2,975,904.
  • Respondent to pay costs of the suit.