[2023] KEELRC 2416 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 2416 (KLR)

The court found that the petitioners had established a prima facie case for the grant of an interlocutory injunction, as their employment status and rights under Article 41 of the Constitution were at risk of being violated by the respondents' intended actions. The respondents failed to file any response or contest...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2416 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Emmanuel Maitha David & 187 others; Respondent: Governor, County Government of Kilifi; Respondent: County Secretary, Kilifi County; Respondent: Kilifi County Public Service Board
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition E003 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application
Outcome
interlocutory injunction granted; application allowed unopposed
Judges
AK Nzei
Legal Topics
Casual Employment, Conversion to Term Contract, Injunctive Relief, Fair Labour Practices
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Casual Employment Conversion to Term Contract Injunctive Relief Fair Labour Practices

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Emmanuel Maitha David & 187 others

Applicant

Governor, County Government of Kilifi

Respondent

County Secretary, Kilifi County

Respondent

Kilifi County Public Service Board

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application

  1. 1 Whether the petitioners, as casual employees, are entitled to injunctive relief restraining the respondents from terminating their employment or recruiting for their positions pending determination of the petition.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents have violated the petitioners' rights under Article 41 of the Constitution regarding fair labour practices.
  3. 3 Whether the respondents failed to follow due process in seeking to terminate or replace the petitioners.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the petitioners had established a prima facie case for the grant of an interlocutory injunction, as their employment status and rights under Article 41 of the Constitution were at risk of being violated by the respondents' intended actions. The respondents failed to file any response or contest the application, despite being given ample opportunity and extensions by the court. In the absence of opposition, and considering the potential for irreparable harm to the petitioners, the court granted the orders sought, restraining the respondents from terminating, advertising, or recruiting for the petitioners' positions pending the hearing and determination of the petition.

Court Disposition

interlocutory injunction granted; application allowed unopposed

Orders

  • Pending hearing and determination of the petition, an order of injunction is issued restraining the respondents, jointly and severally, from terminating, advertising or conducting any recruitment process on the petitioners' positions, and from reinstating any employee whose service has been terminated as a casual...
  • Costs of the application shall be in the petition.