[2014] KEELRC 1429 (KLR)
The court found that the Claimant was duly appointed and served as a member of the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee. The Respondent did not deny the appointment, the discontinuance of services, or the entitlement to the claimed allowances. The letter from the Provincial Commissioner acknowledged the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEELRC 1429 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: David G. Kabuya; Respondent: The Attorney General
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 54 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Employment and Labour Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Public Service Employment, Remuneration and Allowances, Termination of Appointment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David G. Kabuya
Claimant
The Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment and Labour Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to payment of outstanding allowances for services rendered as a member of the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee.
- 2 Whether the Respondent had any valid defence to the Claimant's claim for allowances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Claimant was duly appointed and served as a member of the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee. The Respondent did not deny the appointment, the discontinuance of services, or the entitlement to the claimed allowances. The letter from the Provincial Commissioner acknowledged the outstanding allowances and the obligation to pursue payment. The Respondent failed to provide any substantive defence or evidence to rebut the Claimant's case. The court held that the Claimant was entitled to the outstanding allowances for services rendered, and that the State's failure to pay was unjustified. Accordingly, the court ordered the Respondent to pay the claimed amount...
Court Disposition
claim allowed
Orders
- The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs 163,400/- together with interest from 7 March 2014.
- The Respondent shall pay the Claimant costs of the Cause assessed at Kshs 25,000/-.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU
CAUSE NO. 54 OF 2014
DAVID G. KABUYA......................................................................................CLAIMANT
v
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL...................................................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
David G. Kabuya (Claimant) was appointed as a member of the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee, Rift Valley Province through Gazette Notice No. 2651.
Through a letter dated 20 June 2011, the then Provincial Commissioner, Rift Valley Province informed him and 12 others that their services had been discontinued because their term had expired. The letter thanked him and the others for their good work and diligence and assured them that the Provincial Commissioner’s office would pursue for the payment of their remaining allowances from the Ministry of Lands.
It appears the payments were not paid and on 7 March 2014, the Claimant instituted legal proceedings against the Attorney General on behalf of the Office of the President seeking a total of Kshs 163,400/- being outstanding allowances.
The Respondent was served and after getting leave more than once to file a Response out of time did file a Defence on 28 May 2014.
On 28 May 2014, the Court fixed the Cause for hearing on 17 July 2014, but the hearing did not proceed on that day. Parties agreed by consent to have the Cause proceed for hearing on 27 October 2014.
On 27 October 2014, I heard the Cause. The Respondent did not call any witness.
Claimant’s case
The Claimant’s case is rather straight forward. He was appointed as a member of the Provincial Lands Disputes Appeal Committee as already indicated. His term and that of other members expired and the then Provincial Commissioner, Rift Valley informed them of the discontinuance of their services through a letter dated 20 June 2011.
The letter advised that the office of the Provincial Commissioner would follow up the issue of allowances. The Claimant now seeks Kshs 163,400/- and he produced a Payment Schedule showing the number of sittings, dates of sittings, outstanding sitting allowances, subsistence allowances, lunch allowance and transport allowance.
Respondent’s case
In the Defence filed on 28 May 2014, the Respondent proffered only one line of defence
The contents of paragraphs (3-7)of the memorandum of Claim are denied in toto and the claimant is put to strict proof thereof.
Evaluation
The Respondent has not demonstrated that it had any or any reasonable defence to the case put forth by the Claimant. The appointment was not denied. The discontinuance of services was not denied.
The Respondent did not suggest that the Claimant as a member of the Committee was not entitled to allowances claimed.
The Claimant did his part in serving the nation in a sensitive and critical Committee. Three years down the line he has not been paid the allowances which in effect were meant to facilitate him in serving his country. In all probability he used his own monies eagerly waiting to be paid for his services.
It is very unfortunate that this type of claim was allowed to reach the Court. Despite the finite resources of the State, the Claimant and others who served with him should have been paid. Failing to pay him was failing to recognise his services and contribution to society.
The Court finds the Claimant has made a case for the reliefs sought.
Conclusion and Orders
The Court finds and holds that the Claimant is entitled to the sum of Kshs 163,400/- and the Court orders the Respondent to pay him Kshs 163,400/- together with interest from 7 March 2014.
The Court further awards the Claimant costs of the Cause assessed at Kshs 25,000/-.
Delivered, dated and signed in open Court in Nakuru on this 21st day of November 2014.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Claimant Ms. Wanjiru instructed by Nderitu Komu & Co. Advocates
For Respondent Mr. Kirui, Litigation Counsel, Office of the Attorney General