[2017] KEELRC 1175 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant's dismissal was unfair and unlawful because it was based on his valid medical complaint and the respondent's failure to comply with a clear medical recommendation. The respondent did not provide protective clothing or take steps to ensure a safe working environment, in violation of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELRC 1175 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: David Gaitho Ndungu; Respondent: Timaflor Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 132 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant.
- Judges
- B Ongaya
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Occupational Health and Safety, Medical Fitness for Employment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Gaitho Ndungu
Claimant
Timaflor Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's dismissal from employment was unfair and unlawful.
- 2 Whether the respondent failed to provide a safe working environment and comply with medical recommendations.
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for unfair dismissal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant's dismissal was unfair and unlawful because it was based on his valid medical complaint and the respondent's failure to comply with a clear medical recommendation. The respondent did not provide protective clothing or take steps to ensure a safe working environment, in violation of statutory obligations under the Occupational Health and Safety Act, 2007. The dismissal was aggravated by the respondent's refusal to consider the medical advice and its insistence that the claimant sign documents declaring himself fit to work in hazardous conditions. The court held that the reason for termination was unlawful under section 46(h) of the Employment Act, 2007,...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant.
Orders
- Declaration that the claimant’s dismissal was unfair and unlawful.
- Respondent to pay the claimant Kshs. 143,400.00 by 01.08.2017, failing which interest accrues at court rates from the date of suit until full payment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
CAUSE NO. 132 OF 2016
DAVID GAITHO NDUNGU........................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
TIMAFLOR LIMITED......................... RESPONDENT
(Before Hon. Justice Byram Ongaya on Friday, 16th June, 2017)
JUDGMENT
The claimant filed the memorandum of claim on 08. 06. 2016 through C.M King’ori Advocates. The claimant prayed for judgment against the respondent for:
a. A declaration that the claimant’s dismissal from the employment with the respondents was unfair and unlawful.
b. General damages for unlawful or unfair dismissal.
c. Costs of the suit and interest.
Despite service the respondent failed to enter appearance, to file a response and to attend all steps in the suit including the hearing.
The claimant opted to rely on the pleading and other material on record and filed final submissions.
By a contract of employment dated 24. 10. 2014, the claimant was employed by the respondent from 24. 10. 2014 to 04. 11. 2015 as a flower or maintenance attendant. The contract was renewable. The gross pay was Kshs.9, 008. 00 per month.
The claimant’s case is that the employment was subject to satisfactory medical report by a qualified health practitioner. Further, during the employment the claimant developed health complications diagnosed to be as a result of organophosphate poisoning due to improper working conditions. The claimant’s case was that the respondent failed to provide him with protective clothing considering that in his work environment he was exposed to a lot of chemicals and dust.
The claimant was admitted at the Nanyuki Teaching and Referral Hospital from 14. 09. 2015 to 17. 09. 2015 due to organophosphate poisoning and by the letter dated 29. 09. 2015, Dr. Mercy Kamau, a medical officer at the hospital, recommended that the claimant works in an environment where he is not in contact with organophosphate containing chemicals.
The claimant stated that he gave the doctor’s recommendation to the respondent but the respondent took no action as the claimant continued working in the same environment. Later, the claimant stated that he was summoned by the respondent’s human resource office and he was told to sign documents stating that he was fit to continue working in the same environment. He refused to sign the documents and as a result, he received the dismissal letter on 04. 11. 2015.
The court finds that the dismissal was unfair because it was due to the claimant’s valid complaint that was not irresponsible or without foundation as it was based upon clear medical recommendation. The court finds that the reason for termination was unfair under section 46 (h) of the Employment Act, 2007. The court has considered the aggravating factors that the respondent refused to consider and comply with the medical recommendation, had failed to provide protective clothing for the claimant’s use per section 6 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act, 2007 and had dismissed the claimant upon an unlawful ground. As submitted for the claimant the dismissal was grossly unfair and the court awards the claimant maximum 12 months’ pay under section 49(1) (c) of the Employment Act, 2007at the last monthly pay of Kshs. 11, 950. 00 making Kshs.143, 400. 00.
In conclusion judgment is hereby entered for the claimant against the respondent for:
1. The declaration that the claimant’s dismissal from the employment with the respondent was unfair and unlawful.
2. The respondent to pay the claimant Kshs.143, 400. 00 by 01. 08. 2017 failing interest to be payable thereon at court rates from the date of the suit till full payment.
3. The respondent to pay the claimant’s costs of the suit.
Signed, datedanddeliveredin court atNyerithisFriday, 16th June, 2017.
BYRAM ONGAYA
JUDGE