[2004] KEHC 2594 (KLR)

[2004] KEHC 2594 (KLR)

The court found that the delay of 18 months in filing the suit was occasioned by the late issuance of the Grant of representation and was not deliberate. Applying Section 27 of the Limitation of Actions Act, the court held that the circumstances justified the extension of time. The application was therefore allowed,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] KEHC 2594 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: David Gichaga Munuhe (Suing on his own behalf of the Estate of the late Joseph Muriuki Njogu); Defendant: Azake Beer Limited; Defendant: Said Faraj Said; Defendant: Woodventure Company Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 304 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Limitation Periods, Personal Injury Claims
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Tort Law Extension of Time Limitation Periods Personal Injury Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Gichaga Munuhe (Suing on his own behalf of the Estate of the late Joseph Muriuki Njogu)

Plaintiff

Azake Beer Limited

Defendant

Said Faraj Said

Defendant

Woodventure Company Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file suit for personal injuries resulting in death due to the defendants' alleged negligence.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the suit was reasonable and justified under Section 27 of the Limitation of Actions Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the delay of 18 months in filing the suit was occasioned by the late issuance of the Grant of representation and was not deliberate. Applying Section 27 of the Limitation of Actions Act, the court held that the circumstances justified the extension of time. The application was therefore allowed, and the orders sought were granted.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Extension of time to file suit is granted as prayed.
  • Costs shall be in the cause.