[2013] KEHC 5362 (KLR)
The court found that although the shareholders' agreement and the articles of association provided for arbitration of disputes, section 7(1) of the Arbitration Act expressly allows a party to seek interim measures of protection from the High Court even where an arbitration agreement exists. The plaintiff, as a shareholder and director, was entitled to seek injunctive relief to prevent his removal and interference with his duties, and the agreement itself did not preclude such recourse to the court. The court concluded that the application for stay of proceedings pending arbitration was not merited in the circumstances, as the plaintiff's application was for interim injunctive relief,...
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 5362 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: David Kabubii Kuria; Defendant: Bryan Eric Limited; Defendant: Tafi Enterprises Ltd; Defendant: Melde Vale Holdings Ltd; Defendant: Simon Kimutai; Defendant: Invesco Assurance Company Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2013
- Case Number
- Civil Case 624 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings Pending Arbitration
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- JB Havelock
- Legal Topics
- Arbitration Agreements, Shareholder Disputes, Injunctive Relief, Company Directorship, Interim Measures, Contractual Obligations
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Kabubii Kuria
Plaintiff
Bryan Eric Limited
Defendant
Tafi Enterprises Ltd
Defendant
Melde Vale Holdings Ltd
Defendant
Simon Kimutai
Defendant
Invesco Assurance Company Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings Pending Arbitration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proceedings should be stayed pending arbitration as per the shareholders' agreement.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is bound by the arbitration clause in the agreement or the company's articles of association.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to seek interim injunctive relief from the court despite the arbitration agreement.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the shareholders' agreement and the articles of association provided for arbitration of disputes, section 7(1) of the Arbitration Act expressly allows a party to seek interim measures of protection from the High Court even where an arbitration agreement exists. The plaintiff, as a shareholder and director, was entitled to seek injunctive relief to prevent his removal and interference with his duties, and the agreement itself did not preclude such recourse to the court. The court concluded that the application for stay of proceedings pending arbitration was not merited in the circumstances, as the plaintiff's application was for interim injunctive relief,...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The fifth defendant's Chamber Summons dated 24 October 2012 is dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment