[2018] KEHC 4079 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 4079 (KLR)

The court found that David Kangori Murithi's claim to one acre of the estate was acknowledged by both affidavits and oral evidence, and was not challenged by any party, thus entitling him to that share. The court further held that any purported sale of estate property prior to confirmation of grant is void under...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 4079 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: David Kangori Murithi; Applicant: Umotho M'Ndaka; Respondent: Dorothy Thigaa M'Ndaka; Respondent: Christine Makena Murithi; Respondent: James Mutembei M'Ndaka; Respondent: Eliphas Njeru Murithi; Respondent: Regina Kathini Murithi; Respondent: James Mutegi Murithi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 32 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
grant confirmed as per new distribution; each party to bear own costs
Judges
BB Limo
Legal Topics
Succession, Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Distribution of Estate Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Kangori Murithi

Applicant

Umotho M'Ndaka

Applicant

Dorothy Thigaa M'Ndaka

Respondent

Christine Makena Murithi

Respondent

James Mutembei M'Ndaka

Respondent

Eliphas Njeru Murithi

Respondent

Regina Kathini Murithi

Respondent

James Mutegi Murithi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether David Kangori Murithi, as a nephew, is entitled to a share of the deceased's estate.
  2. 2 What is the proper mode of distribution of the estate Mwimbi/C.Magutuni/459 among the beneficiaries.
  3. 3 Whether any sale of estate property prior to confirmation of grant is valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that David Kangori Murithi's claim to one acre of the estate was acknowledged by both affidavits and oral evidence, and was not challenged by any party, thus entitling him to that share. The court further held that any purported sale of estate property prior to confirmation of grant is void under Section 82(b) of the Law of Succession Act. The remaining one acre of the estate was to be divided equally between Umotho M'Ndaka and Dorothy Thigaa M'Ndaka, as both houses were entitled to a share. The court confirmed the grant in accordance with this mode of distribution, ensuring compliance with succession law and equitable distribution among the beneficiaries.

Court Disposition

grant confirmed as per new distribution; each party to bear own costs

Orders

  • David Kangori Murithi to receive 1 acre of Mwimbi/C.Magutuni/459.
  • Umotho M'Ndaka to receive 0.50 acre of Mwimbi/C.Magutuni/459.