[2017] KEELC 373 (KLR)
The court found that, following the Court of Appeal decision in Civil Appeal No. 287 of 2016, Magistrates' Courts have jurisdiction to hear and determine land matters, provided they fall within their pecuniary jurisdiction. The previous position established by Constitutional Petition No 3 of 2016 was clarified and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 373 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: David Karanja Gaitho; Respondent: Peter Njoroge Mwangi; Respondent: Mary Wanjiru Mwangi
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Muranga
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 17 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Transfer Suit
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Courts, Transfer of Suits, Environment and Land Court, Magistrates Courts Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Karanja Gaitho
Applicant
Peter Njoroge Mwangi
Respondent
Mary Wanjiru Mwangi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Transfer Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Murang’a has jurisdiction to hear and determine land matters after the decision in Constitutional Petition No 3 of 2016.
- 2 Whether the suit CMCC No. 372 of 2015 should be transferred to the Environment and Land Court in Murang’a.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, following the Court of Appeal decision in Civil Appeal No. 287 of 2016, Magistrates' Courts have jurisdiction to hear and determine land matters, provided they fall within their pecuniary jurisdiction. The previous position established by Constitutional Petition No 3 of 2016 was clarified and superseded by the appellate decision. Therefore, there was no legal basis to transfer the suit from the Chief Magistrate’s Court to the Environment and Land Court. The application for transfer was dismissed as the subordinate court is competent to hear the matter.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application to transfer CMCC No. 372 of 2015 from the Chief Magistrate’s Court Murang’a to the Environment and Land Court in Murang’a is dismissed.
- No orders as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
14 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MURANG’A
E.L.C MISC. APP. NO. 17 OF 2017
DAVID KARANJA GAITHO - PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT
VS
PETER NJOROGE MWANGI - 1ST DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
MARY WANJIRU MWANGI - 2ND DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The application is brought under Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act, Order 51 Rule 1 of the CPR, and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Rules. The Applicant seeks to transfer CMCC No. 372 of 2015 from the Chief Magistrate’s Court Murang’a to the Environment and Land Court in Murang’a. The Applicant anchored this application on the Constitutional Petition No 3 of 2016 at Malindi which removed the jurisdiction in respect to matters relating to Environment Land use occupation of and title to land from the Magistrate Court.
2. It is supported by the Affidavit of Joseph Githinji Kariuki Advocate who has deponed that pursuant to the High Court Order dated 17th September 2015 by the Honourable Justice Boas Olao, the suit was transferred from ELC Kerugoya to the Subordinate Court at Murang’a in line with the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Chief Magistrate Court at Murang’a. It has now become necessary, following the Judgement and determination of the Constitutional Petition No 3 of 2016 – Malindi Law society =vs= Attorney General & 4 Others to transfer this matter back to the Environment and Land Court in Murang’a for hearing and determination.
3. The Court of Appeal in Civil Appeal No. 287 of 2016 The Law Society of Kenya Nairobi Branch vs. Malindi Law Society & 6 Others decided that Magistrates have jurisdiction to hear and determine matters in respect to environment, land use, occupation of and title to land, subject to their pecuniary jurisdiction. This being a land matter, and the subordinate Court having being bestowed with the jurisdiction to hear the matter I order that this application be dismissed forthwith with no orders as to costs.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT MURANG’A THIS 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2017.
J.G.KEMEI
JUDGE