[2017] KEHC 4881 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay of over one and a half years in filing the appeal. The reason advanced, that the family failed to appoint a lawyer as promised, was not sufficient to justify such a lengthy delay, particularly given that this was a second...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 4881 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: David Kaucu Muhika; Applicant: Wilson Mukundi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Case 10 & 11 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application declined
- Judges
- A Mabeya
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Delay in Filing Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Kaucu Muhika
Applicant
Wilson Mukundi
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing the appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether the delay of over one and a half years is excusable in the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay of over one and a half years in filing the appeal. The reason advanced, that the family failed to appoint a lawyer as promised, was not sufficient to justify such a lengthy delay, particularly given that this was a second appeal. The court held that the delay was inordinate and unexplained, and therefore declined to grant the application for leave to appeal out of time.
Court Disposition
application declined
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal out of time is declined.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
MISC. CRIMINAL NO. 10 AND 11 OF 2017
DAVID KAUCU MUHIKA ………………………... 1ST APPLICANT
WILSON MUKUNDI ……………………………....2ND APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC …………………………………………..RESPONDENT
ORDER
I have considered the Supporting Affidavit. The decision sought to be appealed against was delivered on 29h October, 2015. There has been a delay of over one and a half years.
The reason being advanced is that the family failed to appoint a lawyer as promised. Considering this was a second appeal, a delay of one and a half years is unexplained and in ordinate.
The application is accordingly declined.
DATED, THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2017.
A. MABEYA
JUDGE
28/06/2017