[2018] KEELC 2691 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 2691 (KLR)

The court found that while the original order stopping developments on the suit land was intended to preserve the property pending determination of the main motion, the unique circumstances of the upcoming Meru Agricultural Show justified a partial review of the order. The court exercised its discretion to allow the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 2691 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: David Keli Kiilu, Brown Ondego, Isaac Njogu, Nelson N. Ng’ombe (suing as the Registered Trustees of the Agricultural Society of Kenya); Defendant: County Government of Meru
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 169 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Review of Injunctive Orders
Outcome
application allowed in part
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Review of Court Orders, Temporary Structures, Agricultural Showgrounds
Source Language
en
Land and Property Interlocutory Injunctions Review of Court Orders Temporary Structures Agricultural Showgrounds

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Keli Kiilu, Brown Ondego, Isaac Njogu, Nelson N. Ng’ombe (suing as the Registered Trustees of the Agricultural Society of Kenya)

Plaintiff

County Government of Meru

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Review of Injunctive Orders

  1. 1 Whether the court should review, vary or set aside its previous order stopping the plaintiff from carrying out developments on the suit land.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff should be allowed to renovate and make temporary structures on the Meru Showground in preparation for the agricultural show.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the original order stopping developments on the suit land was intended to preserve the property pending determination of the main motion, the unique circumstances of the upcoming Meru Agricultural Show justified a partial review of the order. The court exercised its discretion to allow the applicant to proceed with necessary renovations and temporary structures solely for the purpose of conducting the agricultural show, balancing the need to preserve the suit property with the public interest in holding the event. The application was therefore allowed in part, permitting limited developments for the show only.

Court Disposition

application allowed in part

Orders

  • The application dated 7.3.2018 is allowed partially for the applicant to continue with developments on the suit land with a view to conducting the agricultural shows only.