[2020] KEELC 1177 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 1177 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to comply with its directions to file written submissions as ordered on 4/6/2020. In the absence of submissions and any other manner of disposal provided by the court, the application could not be considered on its merits. Consequently, the application dated 3/6/2020 was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 1177 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: David Kibiwott Achikwa; Respondent: Agricultural Development Corporation; Respondent: Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: Chief Land Registrar
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 7 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Contempt
Outcome
application dismissed for want of prosecution
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Enforcement of Court Orders, Land Access Rights
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Enforcement of Court Orders Land Access Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Kibiwott Achikwa

Applicant

Agricultural Development Corporation

Respondent

Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

Chief Land Registrar

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Contempt Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Contempt

  1. 1 Whether Dr. Maurice Cherogony is in contempt of court for disobeying the consent order adopted as judgment on 20/11/2019.
  2. 2 Whether the application for contempt should be allowed in the absence of submissions by the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to comply with its directions to file written submissions as ordered on 4/6/2020. In the absence of submissions and any other manner of disposal provided by the court, the application could not be considered on its merits. Consequently, the application dated 3/6/2020 was dismissed for want of prosecution, regardless of the substantive allegations of contempt. The court emphasized the necessity for parties to adhere to procedural requirements and court orders for the effective administration of justice.

Court Disposition

application dismissed for want of prosecution

Orders

  • The application dated 3/6/2020 is dismissed for want of prosecution.