[2020] KEELRC 1928 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to provide reasonable grounds for the delay in filing the application for stay of execution, noting that the application was filed almost a year after judgment and only on the day the Bill of Costs was due for taxation. The court held that obtaining typed proceedings is not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELRC 1928 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: David Kipchumba Kogo; Respondent: The County Public Service Board Marakwet County and Another
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 22 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- NJ Abuodha, DI Wasike
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Delay in Filing, Appeal Process, Judgment Enforcement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Kipchumba Kogo
Applicant
The County Public Service Board Marakwet County and Another
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient grounds for the grant of stay of execution of the judgment pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the delay in filing the application for stay is justified.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to provide reasonable grounds for the delay in filing the application for stay of execution, noting that the application was filed almost a year after judgment and only on the day the Bill of Costs was due for taxation. The court held that obtaining typed proceedings is not a prerequisite for seeking a stay of execution and that the timing of the application suggested it was intended to delay execution rather than pursue a genuine appeal. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for stay of execution.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application dated 19th October, 2020 for stay of execution is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT ELDORET
CAUSE NO 22 OF 2018
DAVID KIPCHUMBA KOGO.............................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
THE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD MARAKWET COUNTY AND ANOTHER
R U L I N G
1. The applicant in the motion dated 19th October, 2020 seeks orders among others that there be a stay of execution of the judgement of the Court delivered on 28th November, 2019 pending the hearing and determination of the appeal intended to be lodged by the applicant.
2. The judgement of the Court was delivered almost one year ago and this application filed on 21st October, 2020 on the same day the Bill of Costs was due for taxation.
3. Whereas the applicant filed notice of appeal on 11th December, 2019, the applicant stated that he requested for certified copy of proceedings and judgement through a letter dated 11th December, 2019 and that he has been unable to lodge the record of appeal due to the delay in the processing of the Court proceedings.
4. An application for stay of execution of judgement of the trial Court is not a function of obtaining typed proceedings of the trial court. The application can be made as soon as the judgement is to be appealed from is delivered once the notice of appeal is lodged. In the circumstances the court is not convinced that there are reasonable grounds for the delay in bringing the present application. Its filing when the Bill of Costs is slated for taxation can only be construed as delaying tactic in the execution of the Court’s judgement.
5. The application is therefore dismissed.
6. It is so ordered.
Dated at Eldoret this 4th day of December 2020
Abuodha Jorum Nelson
Judge
Delivered this 4th day of December 2020
Abuodha Jorum Nelson
Judge
In the presence of:-
..................................................for the Claimant and
......................................................for the Respondent.
Abuodha J. N.
Judge