[2018] KECA 551 (KLR)

[2018] KECA 551 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal, by consent of both parties, held that the consent judgment in Kitale Environment and Land Court Land Case No. 25 of 2014 remains valid and binding. The court further varied the consent judgment to include a specific timeline for the transfer of 70 acres from the plaintiff to the defendant within...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KECA 551 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: David Kipkoech Kogo; Respondent: Esther Chesaina Bedford Pim
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 67 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Consent Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal settled by consent and struck out
Judges
AM Githinji, GG Okwengu, A Mohammed
Legal Topics
Consent Judgment, Transfer of Land, Appeal Settlement
Source Language
en
Land and Property Consent Judgment Transfer of Land Appeal Settlement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Kipkoech Kogo

Appellant

Esther Chesaina Bedford Pim

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Consent Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the consent judgment in Kitale Environment and Land Court Land Case No. 25 of 2014 remains valid and binding on the parties.
  2. 2 Whether the consent judgment should be varied to include a timeline for transfer of 70 acres to the defendant.
  3. 3 Whether the appeal should be struck out following settlement by consent.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal, by consent of both parties, held that the consent judgment in Kitale Environment and Land Court Land Case No. 25 of 2014 remains valid and binding. The court further varied the consent judgment to include a specific timeline for the transfer of 70 acres from the plaintiff to the defendant within six months from 29th May, 2018. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs, and the appeal was struck out from the register of pending appeals. The decision was based on the mutual agreement of the parties, the binding nature of consent judgments, and the court's power to record and vary such judgments by consent.

Court Disposition

appeal settled by consent and struck out

Orders

  • The consent judgment in Kitale Environment and Land Court Land Case No. 25 of 2014 dated 8th October, 2014 remains valid and binding on the parties.
  • The consent judgment is varied to add that the plaintiff shall transfer 70 acres to the defendant within six months from 29th May, 2018.