[2015] KEHC 6344 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 6344 (KLR)

The court found, upon perusal of the lower court record, that there was no irregularity in the proceedings. Consequently, there was no basis for the High Court to interfere with or revise the lower court's decision. The applicant retains the right to pursue an appeal if dissatisfied.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 6344 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: David Kipngeno Kimeto; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 8 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
Application for revision declined.
Judges
HI Ong'udi
Legal Topics
Criminal Revision, Review of Proceedings
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Criminal Revision Review of Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Kipngeno Kimeto

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was any irregularity in the proceedings of the lower court warranting revision.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found, upon perusal of the lower court record, that there was no irregularity in the proceedings. Consequently, there was no basis for the High Court to interfere with or revise the lower court's decision. The applicant retains the right to pursue an appeal if dissatisfied.

Court Disposition

Application for revision declined.

Orders

  • The application for revision is declined.
  • The applicant is at liberty to file an appeal.