[2013] KEELRC 515 (KLR)
The court found that, pursuant to Gazette Notice No. 9243 of 5th August 2011 and section 32 of the Industrial Court Act 2011, jurisdiction to determine disputes relating to work injury benefits lies with magistrates of the rank of Senior Resident Magistrate and above. As such, the Industrial Court lacked...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEELRC 515 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: David Makau Mutua; Respondent: Awanad Enterprises Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 100 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Suit Out of Time
- Outcome
- Application transferred for want of jurisdiction.
- Judges
- AN Makau
- Legal Topics
- Work Injury Benefits, Jurisdiction of Courts, Limitation of Actions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Makau Mutua
Applicant
Awanad Enterprises Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Suit Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Industrial Court has jurisdiction to grant leave to file a suit out of time for work-related injury claims.
- 2 Whether the application should have been filed before a magistrate's court of the rank of Senior Resident Magistrate or above.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, pursuant to Gazette Notice No. 9243 of 5th August 2011 and section 32 of the Industrial Court Act 2011, jurisdiction to determine disputes relating to work injury benefits lies with magistrates of the rank of Senior Resident Magistrate and above. As such, the Industrial Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application for leave to file suit out of time for work-related injury. The proper forum for such an application is the magistrate's court, and the matter should be transferred accordingly.
Court Disposition
Application transferred for want of jurisdiction.
Orders
- The file is transferred to the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court of Mombasa for determination of the summons dated 24.9.2012.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
Industrial Court of Kenya
Cause 100 of 2012 [if gte mso 9]><xml>
Normal 0
false false false
EN-US X-NONE X-NONE
</xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><![endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; line-height:115%; font-size:11. 0pt;"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-"Times New Roman";} </style> <![endif]
DAVID MAKAU MUTUA.......................................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
AWANAD ENTERPRISES LIMITED..............................RESPONDENT
RULING
The applicant has brought an application by way of the exparte originating summons dated 24. 9.2012. He seeks this court leave to file suit out of time to recover damages for work related injury.
The application is supported by the applicant's own affidavit sworn on the same date appearing on the summons.
The application came up for hearing on 14. 12. 2012 when Madam Sudi appeared for the applicant. The court directed the said Counsel to file written submissions on or before 21. 12. 2012 to enable the court to make a ruling on 8. 2.2013. The submissions were never filed but the court nevertheless proceeded to make this ruling based on the application and the documents on record.
The only issue I will now deal with is whether application is brought before the right court. The answer is negative with respect to Gazette Notice No. 9243 of 5th August 2011 by which the Chief Justice in exercise of power donated under the section 16(2) of the Labour Institution Act (repealed) appointed magistrates of the rank of Senior Resident Magistrate and above to determine all disputes related to work injury benefits.
The said position still obtains by dint of section 32 of the industrial court Act 2011.
Consequently, it is my finding that the summons before me ought to have been filed before a magistrate's court of the rank of senior resident and above. It follows therefore that this file shall be transferred to the senior resident magistrate's court of Mombasa for determination of the Summons dated 24. 9.2012.
Orders accordingly.
Signed,Dated andDelivered on the 8th day of February 2013.
Onesmus N. Makau
JUDGE