[2019] KEHC 5768 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 5768 (KLR)

The High Court found that the trial magistrate's award for loss of dependency was within the acceptable range and there was no basis to disturb it, despite the lack of citation of comparable authorities. The court further exercised its jurisdiction under section 99 of Cap.21 Laws of Kenya to correct a mathematical...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 5768 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: David Mbuba; Appellant: Solomon Itule Mbuvi; Respondent: Victoria Mwongeli Kimwalu; Respondent: Angeline Katee Ngwili
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Makueni
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 256 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment and Correction of Award
Outcome
Award for loss of dependency confirmed and corrected; mathematical error rectified under section 99 of Cap.21.
Judges
CM Kariuki
Legal Topics
Loss of Dependency, Damages Assessment, Mathematical Correction, Appeal Review
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Tort Law Loss of Dependency Damages Assessment Mathematical Correction Appeal Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Mbuba

Appellant

Solomon Itule Mbuvi

Appellant

Victoria Mwongeli Kimwalu

Respondent

Angeline Katee Ngwili

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment and Correction of Award

  1. 1 Whether the trial court's award for loss of dependency was within the acceptable range and should be disturbed on appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to correct mathematical errors in its judgment under section 99 of Cap.21 Laws of Kenya.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found that the trial magistrate's award for loss of dependency was within the acceptable range and there was no basis to disturb it, despite the lack of citation of comparable authorities. The court further exercised its jurisdiction under section 99 of Cap.21 Laws of Kenya to correct a mathematical error in the computation of the final award, ensuring the correct amount was reflected in the judgment. The corrected award was justified and the court confirmed its power to make such corrections suo moto.

Court Disposition

Award for loss of dependency confirmed and corrected; mathematical error rectified under section 99 of Cap.21.

Orders

  • The award for loss of dependency is confirmed at Ksh.4,000,000.
  • Less damages under Law Reform Act of Ksh.120,000.