[2018] KEELC 4722 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 4722 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff and defendants entered into a valid sale agreement for 2.4 acres of land, the plaintiff paid the full purchase price, and took possession. The defendants did not deny the agreement or its terms. The 1st defendant, instead of facilitating transfer, caused title deeds to be issued in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 4722 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: David Msee Samuel; Defendant: Grace Mwithi Maundu; Defendant: G.K. & D Co. Ltd
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 144 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Land Dispute / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's suit allowed; orders granted as prayed.
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Specific Performance, Transfer of Land, Title Deeds, Land Sale Agreements
Source Language
en
Land and Property Specific Performance Transfer of Land Title Deeds Land Sale Agreements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Msee Samuel

Plaintiff

Grace Mwithi Maundu

Defendant

G.K. & D Co. Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Dispute / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to 2.4 acres of land as per the sale agreement with the defendants.
  2. 2 Whether the defendants breached the sale agreement by failing to transfer the land to the plaintiff.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to orders compelling transfer and related reliefs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff and defendants entered into a valid sale agreement for 2.4 acres of land, the plaintiff paid the full purchase price, and took possession. The defendants did not deny the agreement or its terms. The 1st defendant, instead of facilitating transfer, caused title deeds to be issued in her name for parcels including the suit land. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to the 2.4 acres as per the agreement and that the defendants were obligated to transfer the land to him. The court further held that, in the event of non-compliance by the defendants, the Deputy Registrar was authorized to execute the necessary documents to effect the transfer. The...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's suit allowed; orders granted as prayed.

Orders

  • Declaration that the plaintiff is entitled to 2.4 acres out of original plot number 1602G, Lukenya Ranching and Farming Co-operative Society Limited.
  • Order compelling the 1st defendant to transfer 2.4 acres to the plaintiff as per the sale agreement.