[2017] KEHC 1332 (KLR)
The court held that the plaintiff's claim, being founded on tort, is governed by the three-year limitation period under Section 4(2) of the Limitation of Actions Act. The cause of action arose on 26th September 2011, and the suit was filed on 28th June 2013, which is within the three-year limitation period. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 1332 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: David Mwangi Kibogo (Administrator of the estate of the late Scholastica Wamuhu Mwangi); Defendant: Dr. Benson Ndegwa Waweru; Defendant: Marura Nursing Home Limited; Defendant: Meridian Equiator Hospital Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 242 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- preliminary objection dismissed
- Judges
- JK Sergon
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Extension of Time, Wrongful Death Claims
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Mwangi Kibogo (Administrator of the estate of the late Scholastica Wamuhu Mwangi)
Plaintiff
Dr. Benson Ndegwa Waweru
Defendant
Marura Nursing Home Limited
Defendant
Meridian Equiator Hospital Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit is statute barred under the Limitation of Actions Act due to being filed outside the prescribed period.
- 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit filed after the limitation period.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff satisfied the conditions for extension of time under Section 27 of the Limitation of Actions Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the plaintiff's claim, being founded on tort, is governed by the three-year limitation period under Section 4(2) of the Limitation of Actions Act. The cause of action arose on 26th September 2011, and the suit was filed on 28th June 2013, which is within the three-year limitation period. The preliminary objection by the 1st defendant, premised on the argument that the suit was statute barred under Section 29(4), was dismissed because the applicable limitation period for tort had not lapsed. The court further noted that the statutory provisions allow for extension of time in certain circumstances, but in this case, the suit was filed within time and no extension was...
Court Disposition
preliminary objection dismissed
Orders
- The 1st defendant's preliminary objection is dismissed.
- There shall be no orders as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CIVIL CASE NO. 242 OF 2013
DAVID MWANGI KIBOGO (Suing as the
Administrator of the estate of the late
SCHOLASTICA WAMUHU MWANGI).........................PLAINTIFF
-V E R S U S –
DR. BENSON NDEGWA WAWERU...................1ST DEFENDANT
MARURA NURSING HOME LIMITED...............2ND DEFENDANT
MERIDIAN EQUIATOR HOSPITAL LIMITED...3RD DEFENDANT
RULING
1) David Mwangi Kibogo (suing as the administrator of the estate of the late Scholastica Wamuhu Mwangi) the plaintiff herein, by way of the plaint dated on 26th June 2013 and filed on 28th June 2013 instituted a suit against Dr. B. N. Waweru and Marura Nursing Home Limited as the 1st and 2nd defendants herein respectively. The claim is for general and special damages for the death of Scholastica Wamuhu Mwangi, which he alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of the defendants both personally and vicariously.
2) It is from this background that the 1st defendant raised a preliminary objection dated 25th April 2017 on a point of law to be determined in limine, that this honourable court lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine this suit because the plaint herein was filed out of the statutory mandatory period provided under Section 29(4) of the Limitation of Action Act, Cap 22 Laws of Kenya.
3) The death certificate attached shows that the deceased died on 26th September 2011. Under Section 29(4) of the Limitation of Actions Act, the application for extension of time is only applicable where the suit is an action for damages in respect of a deceased person’s death, if the action is brought before the end of 12 months from date on which deceased died. Thus the claim would be statute barred after one year from the deceased’s death i.e on 27th September 2012.
4) Going as by the provisions of Section 29 of the Limitation of Actions Act, an application for extension of time could only be entertained if the suit had been filed after 27th September 2012. The suit herein was filed on 26th June 2013 after the deceased’s death. However Section 4(2) of the Limitation of Actions Act, provides for causes of action founded on tort to be statue barred after 3 years. Consequently, limitation set in on 27th September 2014.
5) The court however, can enlarge time with which to file a suit out of time where the applicant has to satisfy court that she/he has met the conditions set out in Section 27 (2) of the Limitations of Actions Act as set out in the Court of Appeal case of Gathoni –vs- Kenya Co-operative Limited (1982) 2KLR 104 that for an application for leave to be allowed under Section 27 of the Limitation of Actions Act it must be shown to the satisfaction of the court that failure to apply within time was due to lack of knowledge of certain material facts.
6) The applicant must show to the satisfaction of the court that she had taken all reasonable steps and sought appropriate advise in respect of the facts. In addition the application for leave under Section 27 must be brought within one year of the cessation of the period during which the decisive material facts were outside his or her knowledge.
7) Order 26 Rule 3(c ) (i) of the Civil Procedure Rules provides that: 3(c ) (i) – an application under Section 27 of the Limitation of Actions Act made before filing suit shall be made by originating summons supported by an affidavit.
8) The nature of the plaintiff claim herein is founded on tort, consequently it will be statute barred after 3 years. Cause of action arose on 26th September 2011 when the deceased person died.
9) Under Section 29(4) of the Limitations of Actions Act gives 12 Months for a claim to be statute barred i.e 27th September 2012. By virtue of the nature of tort under which the plaintiff claim is brought limitation runs for three years i.e from 26th September 2011 to 27th September 2014.
10) The suit herein was filed on 28th June 2013 and consequently it is properly before this court. The 1st defendant preliminary objection is hereby dismissed with no orders as to costs.
Dated, Signed and Delivered in open court this 24th day of November, 2017.
J. K. SERGON
JUDGE
In the presence of:
........................for the Plaintiff
........................for the Defendant