[2017] KEHC 4980 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 4980 (KLR)

The court found that the issues raised by the defendant regarding the admissibility and privilege of the forensic investigation report constitute triable issues that cannot be determined at the interlocutory stage. The appropriate forum for resolving such matters is at the full hearing of the suit. Consequently, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 4980 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: David Mwangi Mburu; Defendant: KPMG Kenya
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Case 367 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application dismissed; case transferred to Employment and Labour Relations Court
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Forensic Investigation Reports, Legal Privilege, Admissibility of Evidence, Striking Out Pleadings
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Civil Procedure Forensic Investigation Reports Legal Privilege Admissibility of Evidence Striking Out Pleadings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Mwangi Mburu

Plaintiff

KPMG Kenya

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the forensic investigation report is legally privileged and inadmissible in the proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether the suit should be struck out or the forensic report expunged from the record.
  3. 3 Whether the application raises triable issues that can be determined at this stage.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the issues raised by the defendant regarding the admissibility and privilege of the forensic investigation report constitute triable issues that cannot be determined at the interlocutory stage. The appropriate forum for resolving such matters is at the full hearing of the suit. Consequently, the defendant's application to strike out the suit or expunge the report was dismissed. The court further noted that the dispute is a labour matter and directed the transfer of the case to the Employment and Labour Relations Court for hearing and determination.

Court Disposition

application dismissed; case transferred to Employment and Labour Relations Court

Orders

  • The defendant's application is dismissed.
  • The case file shall be transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court for hearing and determination.