[2018] KEELC 59 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 59 (KLR)

The court found that the application to amend the plaint was merited as it merely sought to substitute the deceased chairman of the plaintiff church with the current chairman. The amendment did not alter the substance of the suit or prejudice the defendant. The plaintiffs had instituted the suit in their capacity as...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 59 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: David Mwangi Wanjohi; Plaintiff: James Ndungu Mwangi; Plaintiff: Bernard Maina Mutura; Plaintiff: Kahama Original Gospel Church; Defendant: Samuel Mungai Karanja
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 242 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Amend Plaint
Outcome
application to amend plaint allowed
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Substitution of Parties, Specific Performance, Land Sale Agreements
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Amendment of Pleadings Substitution of Parties Specific Performance Land Sale Agreements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Mwangi Wanjohi

Plaintiff

James Ndungu Mwangi

Plaintiff

Bernard Maina Mutura

Plaintiff

Kahama Original Gospel Church

Plaintiff

Samuel Mungai Karanja

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Amend Plaint

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs should be granted leave to amend the plaint to substitute the deceased chairman with the current chairman of the church.
  2. 2 Whether the amendment would prejudice the defendant or alter the substance of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application to amend the plaint was merited as it merely sought to substitute the deceased chairman of the plaintiff church with the current chairman. The amendment did not alter the substance of the suit or prejudice the defendant. The plaintiffs had instituted the suit in their capacity as officials of the church, and that capacity remained unchanged with the substitution. The court exercised its discretion to allow the amendment, noting that there was no opposition from the defendant and no injustice would be occasioned by granting the application.

Court Disposition

application to amend plaint allowed

Orders

  • Plaintiffs are granted leave to amend the plaint to substitute the deceased chairman with the current chairman.
  • Plaintiffs to effect amendments within 14 days from the date of the ruling.