[2020] KEHC 144 (KLR)
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to review or revise its own conviction and sentence in a criminal matter where an appeal lies. Section 364(5) of the Criminal Procedure Code expressly prohibits revision proceedings at the insistence of a party who could have appealed. Since the applicant had already filed an appeal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 144 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: David Ngasora Nyamongo; Respondent: The State
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyamira
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 2 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder Conviction, Sentence Revision, Jurisdiction of High Court, Appeal Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Ngasora Nyamongo
Applicant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review its own conviction and sentence in a criminal matter.
- 2 Whether a criminal revision can be entertained when an appeal is available and has been filed.
- 3 Whether the applicant's filing of multiple applications constitutes an abuse of court process.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to review or revise its own conviction and sentence in a criminal matter where an appeal lies. Section 364(5) of the Criminal Procedure Code expressly prohibits revision proceedings at the insistence of a party who could have appealed. Since the applicant had already filed an appeal to the Court of Appeal, the application for revision is not only incompetent but also an abuse of the court process. The applicant must await the outcome of his appeal rather than attempt to circumvent the appellate process by filing multiple applications in courts of equal jurisdiction. The application for revision is therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for revision is dismissed as incompetent.
- The ruling shall be typed and personally served upon the applicant by the Deputy Registrar during his visit to Kisii Main Prison.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYAMIRA
REVISION NO. 2 OF 2020
DAVID NGASORA NYAMONGO....................APPLICANT
VERSUS
THE STATE......................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
The applicant in this case was the accused person in Nyamira HCCR Case No. 69 of 2015 where he was charged with the offence of Murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code.
After hearing and considering the evidence, this court convicted him and sentenced him to a term of imprisonment for thirty (30) years. On 9th April 2019 he filed a Constitutional Petition before this court (Petition No. 7 of 2019) seeking a reduction of the sentence but this court rejected the application as it has no jurisdiction to sit on appeal over its own decision. After that on 18th February 2020 he filed a similar application being Criminal Revision No. 10 of 2020 in Kisii High Court. That application is the subject of this ruling as the High Court having noticed that the case emanated from this court ordered its transfer to this court. The gist of the applicant’s prayer if I may quote him is: -
“1. That I the petitioner is desirous and has confidence, trust and faith of petitioning in this court for the following: - reviewing, evaluating and determining sentence and conviction of this case through this petition request.”
In other words, the applicant was asking a court of equal jurisdiction with the one that convicted him to review the conviction and sentence. Neither that court nor indeed this court has jurisdiction to do so least of all in an application for revision. As I held in the Constitutional Petition No. 7 of 2019, the only recourse the petitioner had was to appeal to the Court of Appeal which he in fact had done going by correspondences received in our registry from that Court. The correspondence is in the form of two letters from the Deputy Registrar Court of Appeal Kisumu, to the Deputy Registrar of this Court calling for the records of Nyamira HCCRC No. 69 of 2015 among other cases. His appeal in Kisumu Court of Appeal is allocated Appeal No. 37 of 2019. Accordingly, this application for revision is dismissed as in any event is incompetent as Section 364 (5) of the Criminal Procedure Code states: -
“(5) When an appeal lies from a finding, sentence or order, and no appeal is brought, no proceeding by way of revision shall be entertained at the insistence of the party who could have appealed.
As the applicant did the right thing to appeal, he should await the outcome of the appeal and not try to circumvent the course of justice by filing applications in different courts as that can only be interpreted as an abuse of the court process. The application for revision is dismissed. The ruling shall be typed and the Deputy Registrar shall personally serve it upon the applicant when he visits Kisii Main Prison for the mention of the cases as he does every fortnight. It is so ordered.
E. N. MAINA – J
13/03/2020