[2007] KEHC 654 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 654 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had not taken any steps to prosecute the case or have damages assessed since the consent judgment on liability was entered. The plaintiff was served with the application for dismissal but did not respond or appear. In the absence of any action by the plaintiff to move the case...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 654 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: David Ngure; Defendant: Bernard Kanjau Ngamau
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 133 of 1990
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
plaintiff's suit dismissed for want of prosecution; costs to defendant; defendant may proceed with counterclaim
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Delay in Prosecution, Order 16 Rule 5, Assessment of Damages
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Delay in Prosecution Order 16 Rule 5 Assessment of Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Ngure

Plaintiff

Bernard Kanjau Ngamau

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff's suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 16, rule 5(d) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff took any steps to prosecute the case after consent judgment on liability was entered.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had not taken any steps to prosecute the case or have damages assessed since the consent judgment on liability was entered. The plaintiff was served with the application for dismissal but did not respond or appear. In the absence of any action by the plaintiff to move the case forward, and in accordance with Order 16, rule 5(d) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution. The defendant was granted liberty to set down his counterclaim for hearing, and costs were awarded to the defendant.

Court Disposition

plaintiff's suit dismissed for want of prosecution; costs to defendant; defendant may proceed with counterclaim

Orders

  • The plaintiff's suit is dismissed with costs under Order 16, rule 5(d) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  • The defendant may set down his counterclaim for hearing.