[2008] KECA 330 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal held that the High Court judgment was invalid because it was not signed by both judges who heard the appeal, as required by Section 169(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Without a valid, signed, and dated judgment, there was no proper basis for the Court of Appeal to entertain the appeal. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KECA 330 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: David Njagi Bosco; Appellant: James Muriithi Mungatia; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 9 & 27 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal remitted to High Court for rehearing de novo; purported High Court judgment set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Judgment Signature Requirements, Appeal Procedure, Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Njagi Bosco
Appellant
James Muriithi Mungatia
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court judgment was valid in the absence of signatures from both judges who heard the appeal.
- 2 Whether the Court of Appeal can entertain an appeal from an unsigned and undated High Court judgment.
- 3 What is the proper remedy where a High Court judgment is not signed as required by law.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the High Court judgment was invalid because it was not signed by both judges who heard the appeal, as required by Section 169(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Without a valid, signed, and dated judgment, there was no proper basis for the Court of Appeal to entertain the appeal. The Court relied on its previous decision in Josphat Kigorwe Mururu v. Republic, which established that an unsigned judgment is a nullity and cannot found a valid appeal. Consequently, the Court of Appeal set aside the purported judgment of the High Court and remitted the matter for a rehearing de novo before a different bench of two judges, ensuring compliance with statutory...
Court Disposition
Appeal remitted to High Court for rehearing de novo; purported High Court judgment set aside.
Orders
- The purported undated judgment of the High Court is set aside.
- The appellants' Criminal Appeal No. 21 of 2000 is remitted to the High Court for rehearing de novo by a different bench of two judges.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NYERI Criminal Appeal 9 & 27 of 2002
DAVID NJAGI BOSCO ……………………….…….. 1ST APPELLANT
JAMES MURIITHI MUNGATIA ……………………. 2ND APPELLANT
AND
REPUBLIC ………………………………..…………… RESPONDENT
(Appeal from a Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Meru (Juma & Tuiyot, JJ) dated 13th September, 2001
In
H.C. Cr. Appeal Nos. 21 & 22 of 2000)
*******************************
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
The two appellants were convicted by the Senior Resident Magistrate Nkubu (Meru) of two counts, namely, robbery with violence contrary to section 296 (2) of the Penal Code for which they were sentenced to death and, assault causing actual bodily harm contrary to section 251 of the Penal Code for which they were sentenced to 5 years imprisonment plus 2 strokes of the cane. They appealed to the High Court at Meru against conviction and sentence. Their appeals were heard by a bench of two Judges, Juma, J the Resident Judge High Court at Nyeri and Tuiyot, J, Resident Judge, Meru. The record shows that the superior court delivered a “judgment” on 13th September, 2001 wherein the appeal against conviction and sentence for Robbery with Violence was dismissed whilst the appeal against conviction and sentence for assault causing actual bodily harm, was allowed.
The appellants filed the present appeal in person. Thereafter the court appointed Mr. J. Macharia Advocate to act for the appellants in this appeal as is the practice where an appellant has been sentenced to death. Mr. Macharia filed a supplementary memorandum of appeal containing six grounds of appeal.
Before Macharia started his submissions in support of the appeal it came to light that what appears on the record as a judgment of the superior court is not signed by the two Judges of the superior court who heard the appeal. The “judgment” is only signed by Tuiyot, J but not by Juma, J. Mr. Orinda, the learned Principal State Counsel, has in the circumstances urged us to order a re-hearing of the appeal by the superior court. Mr. Macharia on his part lamented that the appellants have been in custody for a long time but left the matter to the discretion of the Court.
In JOSPHATKIGORWE MURURU V. REPUBLIC – Nyeri Criminal Appeal No. 97 of 2003 (unreported) a similar situation arose and this Court after referring to Section 169 (1) of Criminal Procedure Code and emphasizing that a judgment must be signed and dated said:-
“Thus Court can only hear and determine an appeal from a judgment or ruling of the superior court. There is no valid judgment of the High Court in the purported appeal before us and hence there is no valid appeal to us. We accordingly order that the appellants appeal to the High Court shall be heardDe Novo. by a different bench of two Judges and a valid judgment i.e. one that is dated and signed be rendered by that court.”
Indeed this Court has power under section 361 (2) Criminal Procedure Code to remit the appeal to the superior court for determination by rehearing of the appeal.
In this case, in the absence of a valid judgment of the superior court it follows that the appeal to the superior court has not been determined in accordance with the law. In respect of the count of robbery with violence the appellants were alleged to have killed the victim of the robbery and the Magistrate’s court convicted them. The offence is thus aggravated and it is in the interest of justice that the appeal by the appellants to the superior court should be determined in accordance with the law.
For the foregoing reasons we set aside the purported undated “judgment” of the superior court and like in the case of JOSPHAT KIGORWEMURURU (supra) remit the appellants Criminal Appeal no. 21 of 2000 to the superior court for re-hearing de novo by a different bench of two judges.
We so order.
Dated and delivered at Nyeri this 31st day of October, 2008
E.O. O’KUBASU
…………………………
JUDGE OF APPEAL
E. M. GITHINJI
………………………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
J. ALUOCH
…………………….
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR.