[2015] KEHC 3940 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 3940 (KLR)

The court held that the suit abated on 9th January, 2015, as substitution of the deceased plaintiff was not effected within one year of death. The application for substitution was filed after abatement and no application for extension of time was made. Therefore, there was no valid suit in which substitution could...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 3940 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: David Njenga Wanjeri; Plaintiff: Nahashon Muhoro; Defendant: The Attorney General; Defendant: Joseph Karibu Njenga
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 481 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Substitution of Deceased Plaintiff
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
DA Onyancha
Legal Topics
Abatement of Suit, Substitution of Parties, Extension of Time
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Abatement of Suit Substitution of Parties Extension of Time

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Njenga Wanjeri

Plaintiff

Nahashon Muhoro

Plaintiff

The Attorney General

Defendant

Joseph Karibu Njenga

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Substitution of Deceased Plaintiff

  1. 1 Whether the suit abated due to failure to substitute the deceased plaintiff within the prescribed time period.
  2. 2 Whether the court can grant substitution of a deceased plaintiff after abatement without an application for extension of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the suit abated on 9th January, 2015, as substitution of the deceased plaintiff was not effected within one year of death. The application for substitution was filed after abatement and no application for extension of time was made. Therefore, there was no valid suit in which substitution could be effected, and the relief sought was incapable of being granted. The application was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for substitution is dismissed with costs.