[2013] KEHC 4309 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant, having filed a petition and grounds of appeal but taken no further steps, and having likely completed his sentence, demonstrated a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. The appeal was therefore considered abandoned and the file ordered closed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 4309 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: David Nthiga Muchege; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 2 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Abandonment of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal considered abandoned and file closed.
- Legal Topics
- Abandonment of Appeal, Completion of Sentence, Criminal Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Nthiga Muchege
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Abandonment of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed as abandoned due to inaction by the appellant.
- 2 Whether the completion of sentence renders the appeal moot.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant, having filed a petition and grounds of appeal but taken no further steps, and having likely completed his sentence, demonstrated a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. The appeal was therefore considered abandoned and the file ordered closed.
Court Disposition
Appeal considered abandoned and file closed.
Orders
- The appeal is considered abandoned.
- The file is closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Meru
Criminal Appeal 2 of 2005 [if !mso]> <style> v:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style> <![endif]
DAVID NTHIGA MUCHEGE………………..…………………....…. APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC…………………………………………………………RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
The Appellant was sentenced to 4 years imprisonment In Senior Resident Magistrate’s court Meru on 31st August, 2004.
He filed a petition and grounds of Appeal. No further step was taken in the appeal.Appellant must have completed sentence by now. The Appellant is considered to have lost interest in his appeal. This appeal is considered abandoned and file closed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 26th DAY OF MARCH, 2013
LESIIT, J.
JUDGE.
[if gte mso 9]><xml>
800x600
</xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><xml>
Normal 0
false false false
EN-US X-NONE X-NONE
</xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><![endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; font-size:10. 0pt;"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-"Times New Roman";} </style> <![endif]