[2018] KEELRC 1327 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 1327 (KLR)

The court found that the claim was based on defamation, a tort, and that under Section 4(2) of the Limitation of Actions Act, actions for libel and slander must be brought within twelve months. The claim was filed outside this limitation period. Furthermore, the court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 1327 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: David Nyanumba Moseti; Respondent: NAS Airport Services Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1297 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
claim_struck_out
Judges
HS Wasilwa
Legal Topics
Defamation, Jurisdiction, Limitation of Actions
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Tort Law Defamation Jurisdiction Limitation of Actions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Nyanumba Moseti

Claimant

NAS Airport Services Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the Employment and Labour Relations Court has jurisdiction to hear a claim for defamation.
  2. 2 Whether the claim is time-barred under Section 4(2) of the Limitation of Actions Act (Cap 22).

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claim was based on defamation, a tort, and that under Section 4(2) of the Limitation of Actions Act, actions for libel and slander must be brought within twelve months. The claim was filed outside this limitation period. Furthermore, the court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain defamation claims, as such matters are purely civil and not within the purview of the Employment and Labour Relations Court as defined by Section 12 of its constitutive Act. Consequently, the preliminary objection was upheld and the claim was struck out.

Court Disposition

claim_struck_out

Orders

  • The claim is struck out for want of jurisdiction and limitation of action.
  • Costs awarded to the respondent.