[2021] KEELC 3663 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 3663 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiff was entitled to execute the decree by attachment and sale of a portion of the Defendant's land, as the decretal sum and costs remained unpaid and the Defendant had not opposed the application. The court held that the land must first be valued and subdivided to determine the precise...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 3663 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: David Oyiare Ntungani; Defendant: Matuiya Ole Naisuaku Orket
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 150 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Execution Application
Outcome
application allowed with modifications
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Execution of Decree, Attachment and Sale of Land, Valuation of Property, Prohibitory Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Execution of Decree Attachment and Sale of Land Valuation of Property Prohibitory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Oyiare Ntungani

Plaintiff

Matuiya Ole Naisuaku Orket

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Execution Application

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff/Decree Holder should be granted leave to execute the decree by attachment and sale by auction of a portion of the Defendant's land to satisfy decretal costs and expenses.
  2. 2 Whether prohibitory orders should issue to prevent the Defendant from transferring or encumbering the property pending execution.
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiff should be allowed to participate in the auction process and be granted provision for incidental costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff was entitled to execute the decree by attachment and sale of a portion of the Defendant's land, as the decretal sum and costs remained unpaid and the Defendant had not opposed the application. The court held that the land must first be valued and subdivided to determine the precise portion necessary to satisfy the decree and incidental expenses. Prohibitory orders were necessary to prevent the Defendant from disposing of the property pending execution. The Plaintiff was also permitted to participate in the auction process. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs. The orders were made in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules governing execution...

Court Disposition

application allowed with modifications

Orders

  • Plaintiff/Decree Holder granted leave to execute by attachment and sale by auction of a portion of land KJD/Lorngusua 1292, subject to valuation.
  • Prohibitory order issued against the Defendant from transferring, charging, encumbering, or alienating the property, with registration of the inhibition against the title.