[2020] KEHC 409 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had made genuine efforts to comply with the orders by preparing the cheques, albeit belatedly. The delay of approximately three weeks was not considered unreasonable, and there was no evidence that the applicant intended to disregard the court's authority. The court held that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 409 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: David Wachira; Respondent: Josphine Kambua Katiwa & Festus Munyoki Katiwa (Suing as the administrators of the estate of the late Mwaniki Katiwa)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 688 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Extend Time for Compliance With Court Orders
- Outcome
- application granted
- Judges
- SJ Chitembwe
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Stay of Execution, Appeals Process, Compliance With Court Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Wachira
Appellant
Josphine Kambua Katiwa & Festus Munyoki Katiwa (Suing as the administrators of the estate of the late Mwaniki Katiwa)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Extend Time for Compliance With Court Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to comply with the court orders issued on 29th May, 2020.
- 2 Whether the delay in complying with the court orders was reasonable and justified.
- 3 Whether granting the extension would prejudice the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had made genuine efforts to comply with the orders by preparing the cheques, albeit belatedly. The delay of approximately three weeks was not considered unreasonable, and there was no evidence that the applicant intended to disregard the court's authority. The court held that the respondent would not suffer substantial prejudice apart from a delay in accessing the judgment sum, which would remain secured pending appeal. In the interests of justice and given the applicant's partial compliance, the court exercised its discretion to grant the extension sought, subject to strict timelines for filing the memorandum of appeal and depositing the decretal sum.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- The applicant to file and serve the memorandum of appeal within fourteen (14) days hereof.
- The decretal sum to be deposited either in a joint account or in court within fourteen (14) days hereof.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
MISC. CIVIL APPL. NO. 688 OF 2019
DAVID WACHIRA......................................................................................................APPELLANT
-VERSUS-
JOSPHINE KAMBUA KATIWA & FESTUS MUNYOKI KATIWA
(Suing as theadministratorsof the estate of the late MWANIKI KATIWA)......RESPONDENT
RULING
The application dated 7th August, 2020 seeks the following orders: -
1. THAT time within which to comply with Orders issued on 29th May, 2020 be enlarged and/or that the Applicant be granted further 14 days or such other time as the court may specify to comply with the orders granted.
2. THAT the costs of this Application be provided for.
The application is supported by the affidavit of Mr. Mandela Chege sworn on 7th August, 2020. The respondent filed a replying affidavit sworn by Mr. Edward Oonge on 30th September, 2020.
Mr. Kabita, Counsel for the applicant urged the court to extend time to comply with earlier orders granted by Justice Thuranira. There was delay in preparing the cheques as ordered by the court. The cheques were signed on 22nd July, 2020 and it was already late.
Mr. Muriungi opposed the application. It was submitted that the applicant failed to comply with the court orders. Justice Thuranira observed in her ruling that the cause of the delay in filing the appeal were not satisfactory but allowed the application in the interest of justice. The applicant has not explained why he had to wait for the orders to lapse before seeking extension.
The applicant filed an application dated 29th October, 2019 seeking extension of time to file an appeal as well as stay of execution of the judgment and decree in Milimani CMCC No. 4433 of 2011. Justice Thuranira, in her ruling delivered on 29th May, 2020 granted the orders on condition that the decretal sum be deposited either in court or in joint account of respective counsels within thirty (30) days.
The applicant contends that there was delay in processing the cheques in compliance with the ruling. The cheques were ready by 22nd July, 2020. The ruling was delivered on 29th May, 2020 and time to comply lapsed by 30th June, 2020.
In view of the fact that the applicant has made effort and managed to have the cheques ready and available, I do find that the delay of about three weeks to comply with the earlier orders is not unreasonable. This is not a party who decided to ignore the court orders. There will be no prejudice to the respondent apart from the delay in enjoying the fruits of her judgment. The respondent is however assured that the decretal sum will be readily available upon the conclusion of the appeal.
I do find that the application dated 7th August, 2020 is merited and is hereby granted as prayed in the following terms;
i. The applicant to file and serve the memorandum of Appeal within fourteen (14) days hereof.
ii. The decretal sum to be deposited either in a joint account or in court within fourteen (14) days hereof.
iii. In the event of non-compliance with orders (i) and (ii) herein the respondent shall be at liberty to execute.
iv. Costs of the application shall follow the outcome of the appeal.
Delivered and Dated at Nairobi this 8th day of December, 2020
..............................
S. CHITEMBWE
JUDGE