[2017] KEHC 2710 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 2710 (KLR)

The court held that since the main election petition had already been struck out in its entirety by a prior ruling, there was no longer any substantive matter pending before the court. As a result, the interlocutory application dated 2nd October, 2017 was rendered moot. The court therefore dismissed the application...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 2710 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: David Wamatsi Omusotsi; Respondent: The Returning Officer Mumias East Constituency; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Respondent: Benjamin Washiali Jomo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Election Petition 9 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Election Petitions / Ruling on Interlocutory Application Following Petition Dismissal
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs to the respondents.
Judges
CM Njagi
Legal Topics
Striking Out Affidavits, Admission of Further Affidavits, Witness Intimidation, Disclosure of Election Documents
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Striking Out Affidavits Admission of Further Affidavits Witness Intimidation Disclosure of Election Documents

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Wamatsi Omusotsi

Applicant

The Returning Officer Mumias East Constituency

Respondent

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

Respondent

Benjamin Washiali Jomo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petitions / Ruling on Interlocutory Application Following Petition Dismissal

  1. 1 Whether the court can entertain interlocutory applications after the main election petition has been struck out.
  2. 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to the orders sought in the notice of motion dated 2nd October, 2017.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the main election petition had already been struck out in its entirety by a prior ruling, there was no longer any substantive matter pending before the court. As a result, the interlocutory application dated 2nd October, 2017 was rendered moot. The court therefore dismissed the application with costs to the respondents, emphasizing that without a pending petition, the court lacked jurisdiction to grant the orders sought.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Orders

  • The notice of motion dated 2nd October, 2017 is dismissed with costs to the respondents.