[2019] KEELC 360 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 360 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff/applicant had demonstrated sufficient cause for the non-attendance that led to the dismissal of the suit. Applying the principles under Order 12, rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules and the guidance from Belinda Murai & Others vs Amoi Wainaina, the court exercised its discretion in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 360 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Davies Motors Corporation Limited; Defendant: Marshalls East Africa Limited; Defendant: Foton East Africa Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 16 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Suit
Outcome
application allowed; suit reinstated; costs to plaintiff/applicant
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Orders, Reinstatement of Suit, Non Attendance, Judicial Discretion
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Setting Aside Orders Reinstatement of Suit Non Attendance Judicial Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Davies Motors Corporation Limited

Plaintiff

Marshalls East Africa Limited

Defendant

Foton East Africa Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Suit

  1. 1 Whether the court should set aside or review the dismissal order made for non-attendance of the plaintiff/applicant.
  2. 2 Whether the main suit should be reinstated and set down for further hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff/applicant had demonstrated sufficient cause for the non-attendance that led to the dismissal of the suit. Applying the principles under Order 12, rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules and the guidance from Belinda Murai & Others vs Amoi Wainaina, the court exercised its discretion in favour of the applicant. The court held that mistakes by counsel should not necessarily bar a party from having their case heard on the merits, especially where the interests of justice require rectification. Consequently, the court allowed the application, set aside the dismissal order, and reinstated the main suit for hearing from the point it had previously stopped.

Court Disposition

application allowed; suit reinstated; costs to plaintiff/applicant

Orders

  • The orders made on 20th September 2017 dismissing the suit for non-attendance are set aside.
  • The main suit is reinstated unconditionally and set down for further hearing on a priority basis, picking up from the point at which it had stopped on 11th July 2016.