[2024] KEHC 4709 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 4709 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had demonstrated that it was inexpedient, difficult, or impracticable to appoint new trustees in substitution for the respondents, who are the founding trustees, without the court's assistance. The evidence showed that the whereabouts of the founding trustees were unknown, some...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 4709 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Michael Davis; Applicant: Luther Bois Anukur; Applicant: Lazarus Mapfundematsva; Applicant: Christian Laufenberg; Applicant: Grethel Aguilar Rojas; Applicant: Charles Oluchina; Respondent: David Mcdowell; Respondent: Michael Cokerell; Respondent: Robert Malpas; Respondent: Steven Njuguna; Respondent: James Muchira
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case E188 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Judgment
Outcome
originating summons allowed as prayed; applicants appointed as trustees; previous appointments ratified; endorsement requirement dispensed with; costs to applicants.
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Trustee Appointment, Trust Deed Rectification, Endorsement of Trustees, Powers of Court Under Trustee Act, Ratification of Trustee Actions
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Trustee Appointment Trust Deed Rectification Endorsement of Trustees Powers of Court Under Trustee Act Ratification of Trustee Actions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Davis

Applicant

Luther Bois Anukur

Applicant

Lazarus Mapfundematsva

Applicant

Christian Laufenberg

Applicant

Grethel Aguilar Rojas

Applicant

Charles Oluchina

Applicant

David Mcdowell

Respondent

Michael Cokerell

Respondent

Robert Malpas

Respondent

Steven Njuguna

Respondent

James Muchira

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the court should discharge the founding trustees and appoint the applicants as new trustees of the International Union For Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Registered Trustees.
  2. 2 Whether the court should ratify previous trustee appointments and actions not endorsed by the Registrar.
  3. 3 Whether the requirement for endorsement of trustee changes by the Registrar should be dispensed with in the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had demonstrated that it was inexpedient, difficult, or impracticable to appoint new trustees in substitution for the respondents, who are the founding trustees, without the court's assistance. The evidence showed that the whereabouts of the founding trustees were unknown, some were presumed deceased, and prior changes in trusteeship had not been endorsed by the Registrar due to lack of proper legal guidance. The court held that, pursuant to Sections 37, 42, 44, and 56 of the Trustee Act, it had the power to appoint new trustees and ratify previous appointments and actions. The court further found that the respondents would not suffer prejudice and that...

Court Disposition

originating summons allowed as prayed; applicants appointed as trustees; previous appointments ratified; endorsement requirement dispensed with; costs to applicants.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicants to institute the originating summons as de facto nominated trustees.
  • It is declared inexpedient, difficult or impracticable to appoint new trustees in substitution for the respondents without court assistance as the founding trustees cannot be found.