[2022] KEHC 16562 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 16562 (KLR)

The High Court found that the injuries sustained by the appellant, while serious, were less severe than those in the authorities cited by the appellant, where higher awards were made. The trial magistrate had considered the evidence, the nature of the injuries, and exercised discretion appropriately in awarding...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 16562 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: DCS (a minor suing thro' a friend JCS); Respondent: Ayoob Noor Mohamed & Company Limited; Respondent: Amoo Holdings International Limited; Respondent: Evans Lojore
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 189 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Judges
TM Matheka
Legal Topics
Assessment of Damages, Personal Injury, Road Traffic Accidents, Appeals on Quantum
Source Language
en
Tort Law Civil Procedure Assessment of Damages Personal Injury Road Traffic Accidents Appeals on Quantum

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

DCS (a minor suing thro' a friend JCS)

Appellant

Ayoob Noor Mohamed & Company Limited

Respondent

Amoo Holdings International Limited

Respondent

Evans Lojore

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the trial magistrate erred in law and fact by awarding general damages that were inordinately low given the severity of the appellant's injuries.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found that the injuries sustained by the appellant, while serious, were less severe than those in the authorities cited by the appellant, where higher awards were made. The trial magistrate had considered the evidence, the nature of the injuries, and exercised discretion appropriately in awarding general damages of Kshs 500,000. There was no basis for the appellate court to interfere with the trial court's exercise of discretion, as the award was not inordinately low nor based on a misapprehension of the law or facts. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • No orders as to costs.