[2020] KEELC 2760 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 2760 (KLR)

The court found that the orders for injunction and vacant possession had already been granted in the main judgment, rendering the current application for similar reliefs superfluous. The court emphasized that enforcement of such orders should be conducted by accredited court bailiffs or auctioneers, who may then...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 2760 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Delamier Wamboga Wambogo; Defendant: Ananstansia Aluoch Anino; Defendant: Okelo Anino; Defendant: Margaret Eandala Amanja; Defendant: Abale Owiti
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 832 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Post Judgment Enforcement Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
TM Olando
Legal Topics
Vacant Possession, Eviction, Permanent Injunction, Enforcement of Judgments
Source Language
en
Land and Property Vacant Possession Eviction Permanent Injunction Enforcement of Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Delamier Wamboga Wambogo

Plaintiff

Ananstansia Aluoch Anino

Defendant

Okelo Anino

Defendant

Margaret Eandala Amanja

Defendant

Abale Owiti

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Post Judgment Enforcement Application

  1. 1 Whether the respondents should be ordered to give vacant possession of the suit properties to the applicant.
  2. 2 Whether a permanent injunction should issue against the respondents from interfering with the applicant's rights over the suit properties.
  3. 3 Whether the Officer Commanding Station (OCS) Yala Police Station should be directed to enforce compliance with the court orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the orders for injunction and vacant possession had already been granted in the main judgment, rendering the current application for similar reliefs superfluous. The court emphasized that enforcement of such orders should be conducted by accredited court bailiffs or auctioneers, who may then seek security from the police through a court order. The court dismissed the application, holding that direct involvement of the police in enforcing court orders without proper procedure is improper and open to abuse. The applicant was directed to follow the correct enforcement process by instructing auctioneers or bailiffs and then seeking police security through the court if...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.
  • The applicant is ordered to engage accredited court bailiffs or auctioneers for enforcement.