[2002] KECA 223 (KLR)

[2002] KECA 223 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal exercised its discretion to adjourn the application for injunction and/or stay of execution, as requested by the applicant's counsel and not opposed by the respondent's counsel. The application was stood over generally with liberty to apply, and the costs for the day were reserved. The court did...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KECA 223 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: The Delphis Bank Limited (under Statutory Management); Respondent: Surjit Singh; Respondent: Malkiat Singh; Respondent: Miwani Sugar Company (1989) Limited (in receivership)
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 435 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Injunction And/or Stay Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application stood over generally with liberty to apply; costs reserved.
Judges
RO Kwach
Legal Topics
Injunctions, Stay of Execution, Appeals, Adjournment of Applications
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Injunctions Stay of Execution Appeals Adjournment of Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Delphis Bank Limited (under Statutory Management)

Applicant

Surjit Singh

Respondent

Malkiat Singh

Respondent

Miwani Sugar Company (1989) Limited (in receivership)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Injunction And/or Stay Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the application for injunction and/or stay of execution pending appeal should be adjourned or heard immediately.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal exercised its discretion to adjourn the application for injunction and/or stay of execution, as requested by the applicant's counsel and not opposed by the respondent's counsel. The application was stood over generally with liberty to apply, and the costs for the day were reserved. The court did not proceed to determine the substantive merits of the application, as the adjournment was mutually agreed upon by the parties present.

Court Disposition

Application stood over generally with liberty to apply; costs reserved.

Orders

  • The application is stood over generally with liberty to apply.
  • Today's costs are reserved.