[2018] KEHC 147 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 147 (KLR)

The court found that the order of 7th March 2018, which directed the release and equal sharing of the security for costs among the respondents' counsel, had not been set aside and remained valid. The accounting process of the court requires the original receipt to be produced before any payout can be effected. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 147 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Hon. Denis Magare Makori; Applicant: Hon. Samson Bichanga; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC); Respondent: Wilson Kimutai Kipchumba; Respondent: Silvanus Osoro Onyiego; Respondent: Jacob Mbicha Mogere
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisii
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Election Petition 5 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Post Judgment Application for Release of Security for Costs
Outcome
Application allowed in part; petitioners' advocate ordered to deposit original receipt within 14 days; Deputy Registrar to effect release upon compliance; no order as to costs.
Judges
REA Ougo
Legal Topics
Security for Costs, Release of Court Deposit, Compliance With Court Orders
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Civil Procedure Security for Costs Release of Court Deposit Compliance With Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hon. Denis Magare Makori

Applicant

Hon. Samson Bichanga

Applicant

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC)

Respondent

Wilson Kimutai Kipchumba

Respondent

Silvanus Osoro Onyiego

Respondent

Jacob Mbicha Mogere

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petition / Post Judgment Application for Release of Security for Costs

  1. 1 Whether the court should dispense with the requirement for production of the original receipt for the security deposit to effect its release to the respondents' counsel.
  2. 2 Whether the petitioners' failure to release the original deposit slip amounts to contempt or unjustly denies the respondents their entitled costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the order of 7th March 2018, which directed the release and equal sharing of the security for costs among the respondents' counsel, had not been set aside and remained valid. The accounting process of the court requires the original receipt to be produced before any payout can be effected. The petitioners, having custody of the original receipt, were ordered to deposit it with the court within 14 days to facilitate compliance with the earlier order. The court declined to dispense with the requirement for the original receipt, instead directing the petitioners' advocate to produce it, and set a mention date to confirm compliance. No order as to costs was made for this...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; petitioners' advocate ordered to deposit original receipt within 14 days; Deputy Registrar to effect release upon compliance; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The petitioners' advocate shall deposit the original receipt used to deposit the security within 14 days from the date of this ruling.
  • Upon release of the original receipt, the Deputy Registrar shall effect the release of the sums deposited as per the court order dated 7th March 2018.