[2018] KEMC 73 (KLR)

[2018] KEMC 73 (KLR)

The court found that the petitioner had complied with all mandatory procedures for withdrawal of an election petition as set out in the Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules, 2017. There was no objection from any party, and no application for substitution of the petitioner was made. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEMC 73 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Dennis Duncan Muhanda; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Respondent: Elida Ashiambi Ochieng (Returning Officer Lurambi Constituency); Respondent: Muhati David Shikala
Court
Magistrate's Court
Court Station
Election Petition in Magistrate Courts
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Election Petition 2 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Application for Leave to Withdraw Petition
Outcome
Petition withdrawn with leave of court; each party to bear its own costs.
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Election Petition, Compliance With Election Petition Rules, Costs in Election Petitions
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Withdrawal of Election Petition Compliance With Election Petition Rules Costs in Election Petitions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dennis Duncan Muhanda

Applicant

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

Respondent

Elida Ashiambi Ochieng (Returning Officer Lurambi Constituency)

Respondent

Muhati David Shikala

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petition / Application for Leave to Withdraw Petition

  1. 1 Whether the petitioner has complied with the mandatory procedure for withdrawal of an election petition.
  2. 2 Whether there is any objection to the withdrawal of the petition by any party.
  3. 3 Whether costs should be awarded or each party should bear its own costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the petitioner had complied with all mandatory procedures for withdrawal of an election petition as set out in the Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules, 2017. There was no objection from any party, and no application for substitution of the petitioner was made. The court exercised its discretion under section 80(1)(d) of the Elections Act to allow the withdrawal without undue regard to technicalities. The parties had agreed that each would bear its own costs. Accordingly, the court granted leave to withdraw the petition and ordered that each party bear its own costs. A certificate of determination was to issue to the Speaker of the County...

Court Disposition

Petition withdrawn with leave of court; each party to bear its own costs.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the petitioner to withdraw Kakamega Election Petition number 2 of 2017.
  • Each party to pay its own costs.