[2019] KEELRC 300 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 300 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant's employment was governed by statutory wage orders and the Employment Act, 2007. The respondent failed to appear or provide any employment records or defence, leaving the claimant's evidence unchallenged. The court accepted the claimant's testimony regarding underpayment, overtime,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 300 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Dennis Mogire Nyang’acha; Respondent: Intercity Secure Homes Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 381 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant.
Judges
M Mbarũ
Legal Topics
Unlawful Termination, Wage Underpayment, Overtime Compensation, Deductions From Wages, Leave Entitlements
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unlawful Termination Wage Underpayment Overtime Compensation Deductions From Wages Leave Entitlements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dennis Mogire Nyang’acha

Claimant

Intercity Secure Homes Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unlawfully terminated from employment.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to underpayments, overtime, off duties, prorated leave, and other terminal dues.
  3. 3 Whether the deductions made from the claimant's wages were lawful.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant's employment was governed by statutory wage orders and the Employment Act, 2007. The respondent failed to appear or provide any employment records or defence, leaving the claimant's evidence unchallenged. The court accepted the claimant's testimony regarding underpayment, overtime, lack of rest days, and unlawful deductions. The court held that the deductions for the lost tyre and uniform were not justified as there was no evidence of the claimant's culpability, especially since the loss occurred when he was not on duty. The court also found that the claimant was not compensated for overtime, off duties, and prorated leave, all of which are statutory...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant KES 35,862.40 for underpayments.
  • Respondent to pay claimant KES 39,184.45 for overtime.