https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/8677

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/8677

The High Court lacked jurisdiction to revisit or alter the applicant’s sentence after the Court of Appeal had already dismissed the appeal, because doing so would amount to second guessing a superior court’s judgment; the motion was therefore without merit and was dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 8677 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Dennis Okinyo Akello; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E005 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Motion After Dismissal of Appeal
Outcome
Motion dismissed.
Judges
["A Mabeya"]
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Credit for Time Spent in Custody, Revision Jurisdiction, Effect of Court of Appeal Judgment
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Sentencing Credit for Time Spent in Custody Revision Jurisdiction Effect of Court of Appeal Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dennis Okinyo Akello

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Motion After Dismissal of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the High Court could revise the applicant’s sentence after the Court of Appeal had already dismissed his appeal.
  2. 2 Whether time spent in custody under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code should be credited against the sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court lacked jurisdiction to revisit or alter the applicant’s sentence after the Court of Appeal had already dismissed the appeal, because doing so would amount to second guessing a superior court’s judgment; the motion was therefore without merit and was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Motion dismissed.

Orders

  • The Motion dated 9 March 2026 is dismissed.
  • The applicant may, if he so desires, apply to the Court of Appeal for appropriate orders.