[2019] KEHC 590 (KLR)
The trial court failed to comply with the mandatory procedure for taking a plea as outlined in section 207 of the Criminal Procedure Code and the precedent set in Adan v R. The accused's plea was not formally entered as guilty, and no facts were read to him or admitted. This rendered the plea equivocal and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 590 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Dennis Omosa; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 77 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- conviction quashed; sentence set aside; applicant discharged
- Judges
- REA Ougo
- Legal Topics
- Plea Taking Procedure, Conviction Legality, Sentencing Irregularities
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dennis Omosa
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial court complied with the legal procedure for taking a plea under section 207 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 2 Whether the conviction and sentence were lawful given the manner in which the plea was taken.
Ratio Decidendi
The trial court failed to comply with the mandatory procedure for taking a plea as outlined in section 207 of the Criminal Procedure Code and the precedent set in Adan v R. The accused's plea was not formally entered as guilty, and no facts were read to him or admitted. This rendered the plea equivocal and the subsequent conviction and sentence illegal. The court found that the irregularities in the plea-taking process vitiated the entire proceedings, necessitating the quashing of the conviction and setting aside of the sentence.
Court Disposition
conviction quashed; sentence set aside; applicant discharged
Orders
- The conviction is quashed.
- The sentence is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII
MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.77 OF 2019
DENNIS OMOSA............................................................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC...................................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Dennis Omosa the appellant was charged before the Chief Magistrate’s Court in Criminal Case No.2195 of 2019 with the offence of manufacturing alcoholic drink without licence contrary to section 8(1)(B) as read with section 71 of the Kisii County alcoholic drinks control Act of the 2015.
2. The applicant was presented in court on the 2/9/2019 for plea. After the charge was read to him in Ekegusii he pleaded ‘Ni kweli’. The records states that thereafter prosecution produced the exhibits and the court thereafter fined the applicant Kshs.50, 000/= in default 6 months.
3. No plea of guilty was entered by the trial court. No facts were read to the applicant. The trial court obviously failed to comply with the provisions of the law on taking a plea in section 207 of Criminal Procedure Code. In the case of Adan v R (1973) E.A at page 445 the Court of Appeal clearly set out the procedure for taking plea when the accused pleads guilty as follows;
“When a person is charged, the charge and the particulars should be read out to him, so far as possible in his own language, but if that is not possible, then in a language which he can speak and understand. The magistrate should then explain to the accused person all the essential ingredients of the offence charged. If the accused then admits all those essential elements, the magistrate should record what the accused has said, as nearly as possible in his own words, and then formally enter a plea of guilty. The magistrate should next ask the prosecutor to state the facts of the alleged offence and, when the statement is complete, should give the accused an opportunity to dispute or explain the facts or to add any relevant facts. If the accused does not agree with the statement of facts or asserts additional facts which, if true, might raise a question as to his guilt, the magistrate should record a change of plea to “not guilty” and proceed to hold a trial. If the accused does not deny the facts in any material respect, the magistrate should record a conviction and proceed to hear any further facts relevant to sentence. The statement of facts and the accused’s reply must, of course, be recorded”.
4. From the record the plea was equivocal. The conviction was illegal and is quashed. The sentence is set aside. The applicant is discharged. He is free to go unless lawfully held.
Dated, signed and deliveredat Kisii this 11th day of November 2019.
R.E. OUGO
JUDGE
In the Presence of;
Mr. Otieno Senior Prosecution Counsel office of the DPP
Evans Court Clerk