[2016] KEHC 1213 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 1213 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie arguable case for judicial review and that the urgency of the matter, specifically the impending deportation of the applicant, justified the grant of leave to apply for judicial review orders. Furthermore, the court held that the leave granted should...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 1213 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Dequina Bernie; Respondent: The Cabinet Secretary for Interior; Respondent: The Director of Immigration
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 488 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Leave Application
Outcome
Leave granted to apply for judicial review; leave to operate as stay of deportation order.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Immigration Control, Deportation Orders, Fair Administrative Action
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Constitutional Law Judicial Review Immigration Control Deportation Orders Fair Administrative Action

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dequina Bernie

Applicant

The Cabinet Secretary for Interior

Respondent

The Director of Immigration

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Leave Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie arguable case for leave to apply for judicial review orders.
  2. 2 Whether leave should operate as a stay of enforcement of the deportation order pending determination of the substantive motion.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie arguable case for judicial review and that the urgency of the matter, specifically the impending deportation of the applicant, justified the grant of leave to apply for judicial review orders. Furthermore, the court held that the leave granted should operate as a stay of the deportation order to preserve the subject matter of the proceedings and prevent the proceedings from being rendered nugatory. The court directed that the substantive motion be filed and served within three days and scheduled a mention to confirm compliance.

Court Disposition

Leave granted to apply for judicial review; leave to operate as stay of deportation order.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to apply for Judicial Review Orders of Prohibition, Certiorari and Mandamus as sought.
  • The leave granted shall operate as a stay of enforcement of the Deportation Order until hearing and determination of these proceedings.