[2018] KEHC 1894 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 1894 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had already served and completed his sentence through remission, and the period for which he was to be incarcerated had already lapsed. As such, any request for revision or relief was rendered moot and could not be entertained by the court. The matter was therefore overtaken by...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 1894 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Derrick Oduor Ouma; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 72 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Judgment
Outcome
Request for revision overtaken by events; file closed.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Stealing Offence, Sentencing, Prison Remission
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Stealing Offence Sentencing Prison Remission

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Derrick Oduor Ouma

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's sentence or conviction could be revised under the prison decongestion programme.
  2. 2 Whether the matter was moot due to the applicant having completed his sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had already served and completed his sentence through remission, and the period for which he was to be incarcerated had already lapsed. As such, any request for revision or relief was rendered moot and could not be entertained by the court. The matter was therefore overtaken by events, and there was no longer any live issue for the court to determine.

Court Disposition

Request for revision overtaken by events; file closed.

Orders

  • The file is hereby closed for archiving purposes.