[2020] KEELC 773 (KLR)
The court found that the creation and insertion of a road of access on the plaintiff's land parcel was illegal, unlawful, and fraudulent, as acknowledged by the National sub-county surveyor and consented to by the defendants. The court adopted the parties' consent, which provided for the cancellation of the road,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELC 773 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Desderio Nyaga Nyamu; Defendant: The Land Registrar Tharaka Nithi District; Defendant: The District Surveyor Meru South District; Defendant: Director of Surveys; Defendant: The Chief Land Registrar; Defendant: The Attorney General
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 11 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Land and Environment Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff; orders granted as per consent; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Land Registration, Boundary Disputes, Rectification of Registry, Fraudulent Land Entries
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Desderio Nyaga Nyamu
Plaintiff
The Land Registrar Tharaka Nithi District
Defendant
The District Surveyor Meru South District
Defendant
Director of Surveys
Defendant
The Chief Land Registrar
Defendant
The Attorney General
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land and Environment Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the creation and insertion of a road of access on the plaintiff's land parcel was illegal, unlawful, or fraudulent.
- 2 Whether the registry index map should be amended to reflect the correct boundary as per the original mutation form.
- 3 Whether the defendants should be compelled to delete the road of access and reinstate the original boundary.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the creation and insertion of a road of access on the plaintiff's land parcel was illegal, unlawful, and fraudulent, as acknowledged by the National sub-county surveyor and consented to by the defendants. The court adopted the parties' consent, which provided for the cancellation of the road, amendment of the registry index map, and reinstatement of the correct boundary as per the original mutation form. The court issued orders accordingly, granting the defendants 60 days to implement the changes and directing that each party bear its own costs. The judgment was based on the binding nature of consent orders and the statutory requirement for accurate land registration...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff; orders granted as per consent; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Declaration that the creation and insertion of a road of access on land parcel No. Karingani/Ndagani/5622 is illegal, unlawful, fraudulent, null and void ab initio.
- Order requiring the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th defendants to delete the road of access from the registry index map sheet No. 13 Karingani Ndagani and any other relevant registry index map.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
37 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA
CHUKA ELC CASE NO. 11 OF 2020
DESDERIO NYAGA NYAMU.........................................................................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
THE LAND REGISTRAR THARAKA NITHI DISTRICT.....................................1ST DEFENDANT
THE DISTRICT SURVEYOR MERU SOUTH DISTRICT...................................2ND DEFENDANT
DIRECTOR OF SURVEYS.......................................................................................3RD DEFENDANT
THE CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR............................................................................4TH DEFENDANT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.................................................................................5TH DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
1. In his plaint dated 21st August, 2020, the plaintiff prays for judgment against the defendants jointly and severally for:
a) An order for declaration that the creation and inserting of road of access measuring 30ft by 420ft in the registry index map sheet No. 13 Karingani Ndagani in the plaintiff’s land parcel No. Karingani/Ndagani/5622 is illegal, unlawful, fraudulent, null and void ab initio.
b) An order requiring the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants to delete the road of access measuring 30 ft by 420 ft created and inserted on the plaintiff’s land parcel No. Karingani/Ndagani/5622 from the registry index map sheet No. 13 Karingani Ndagani and / or from any other registry index map sheet in the possession of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants.
c) An order requiring the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants to amend registry index map sheet No. 13 Karingani Ndagani and / or from any other registry index map sheet in the possession of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants and reinstate the boundary so that it conforms and reflects the correct boundary of the plaintiff’s land parcel No. Karingani/Ndagani/5622 as it exists on the ground and as per mutation form No. 133516 duly signed by the original owner of land parcel No. Karingani/Ndagani/5 one Antony Nyamu M’Rikiri now deceased and registered in the 1st defendant’s land registry on 5. 11. 2003.
d) Costs of the suit.
e) Any other relief the court may deem just and fit to grant.
2. In a letter dated 15th September, 2020, the National sub-county surveyor, Chuka agreed that the plaintiff’s claim had validity.
3. On 28th October, 2020 Mr. Kiogora Arithi, the plaintiff’s advocate and Mr.Justin Kiongo, the defendants’ advocate proffered a consent which they asked the court to adopt as its order. The consent is in the following terms:
Kiogora A plaintiff/applicant
Kiongo defendant/respondent
By consent of the plaintiff and the defendants and their clients respectively we agree that, the road on parcel No. Karingani/Ndagani/5622 be cancelled since there is aroad of access to parcel No. Karingani/Ndagani/1431. The surveyor to be allowed 60 days to implement this consent. Upon implementation the matter be marked as settled with no orders as to cost.
Kiogora A for applicant 28. 10. 2020
Kiongo for defendants 28. 10. 2020
4. The consent was properly executed by the advocates representing the parties.
5. In the circumstances, I enter judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants in the following terms:
a) An order is hereby issued declaring that the creation and inserting of a road of access measuring 30 feet by 420 feet in the Registry Index Map Sheet No. 13 Karingani Ndagani in the plaintiffs Land Parcel No. KARINGANI/NDAGANI/5622 is illegal, unlawful, fraudulent, AND null and void ab initio.
b) An order is hereby issued requiring the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants to delete the road of access measuring 30 feet by 420 feet created and inserted on the plaintiff’s LAND PARCEL NO. KARINGANI/NDAGANI/5622 FROM THE Registry Index Map Sheet No. 13 Karingani Ndagani and/or from any other Registry Index Map Sheet in the possession of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants.
c) An order is hereby issued requiring the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants to amend Registry Index Map Sheet No. 13 Karingani Ndagani and / or from any other Registry Index Map Sheet in the possession of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants and reinstate the boundary so that it conforms and reflects the correct boundary of the plaintiffs LAND PARCEL NO. KARINGANI/NDAGANI/5622 as it exists on the ground and as per Mutation Form No. 133516 duly signed by the original owner of LAND PARCEL NO. KARINGANI/NDAGANI/one ANTONY NYAMU M’RIKIRI (now deceased) and registered in the 1st defendants name at the Land Registry on 5. 11. 2003.
d) As agreed in the consent adopted as its order by the court on 28th October, 2020, the 2nd defendant and all other defendants are granted a maximum of 60 days to implement the orders contained in this judgment.
e) Parties will bear their own costs, and, therefore, there is no order as to costs.
Delivered in open Court at Chuka this 4th day of November, 2020 in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
Kiongo for the defendant
Kiongo h/b Kiogora Arithi for the plaintiff
P. M. NJOROGE,
JUDGE.