[2020] KEHC 5689 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 5689 (KLR)

The court found that although there had been delay in bringing the application for leave to institute judicial review proceedings, the decree in question was still executable as the 12-year limitation period had not yet lapsed. Given the urgency due to the impending lapse of the decree, the court exercised its...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 5689 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Desh General Traders Ltd; Respondent: County Secretary, County Government of Siaya; Respondent: County Government of Siaya
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 32 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Institute Judicial Review Proceedings
Outcome
Leave granted to file judicial review proceedings for mandamus; application certified urgent.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus Orders, Execution of Decree
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Administrative Law Judicial Review Mandamus Orders Execution of Decree

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Desh General Traders Ltd

Applicant

County Secretary, County Government of Siaya

Respondent

County Government of Siaya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Institute Judicial Review Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether leave should be granted to institute judicial review proceedings for orders of mandamus against the respondents.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in bringing the proceedings bars the applicant from obtaining leave.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although there had been delay in bringing the application for leave to institute judicial review proceedings, the decree in question was still executable as the 12-year limitation period had not yet lapsed. Given the urgency due to the impending lapse of the decree, the court exercised its discretion to grant leave to the applicant to file for orders of mandamus against the respondents. The court directed that the main motion be filed and served within seven days to ensure compliance with the limitation period.

Court Disposition

Leave granted to file judicial review proceedings for mandamus; application certified urgent.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to file judicial review orders of mandamus against the respondents.
  • The main motion shall be filed and served within 7 days of the ruling date.