[2025] KEHC 2677 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 2677 (KLR)

The court declined to proceed with the substantive determination of the reference application challenging the taxing master's decision, as there was a pending motion by the applicant's advocates to cease acting for the 5th defendant/respondent. The court held that the motion to cease acting must be heard and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 2677 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Detiland Company Limited; Respondent: Radio Africa Limited; Respondent: Star Publications Limited; Respondent: Julius Otieno; Respondent: Henry Makori; Respondent: Alex Sandike ole Magelo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application E269 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Reference From Taxing Master Ruling
Outcome
Reference application stood over pending determination of advocates' motion to cease acting.
Judges
JN Mulwa
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Costs, Review of Taxing Master Decision, Party and Party Bill of Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Costs Review of Taxing Master Decision Party and Party Bill of Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Detiland Company Limited

Applicant

Radio Africa Limited

Respondent

Star Publications Limited

Respondent

Julius Otieno

Respondent

Henry Makori

Respondent

Alex Sandike ole Magelo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Reference From Taxing Master Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the taxing master erred in law and principle in assessing instruction fees at Kshs. 34,610 instead of Kshs. 5,658,900.
  2. 2 Whether the taxing master erred by taxing off Kshs. 4,190,000 as instruction fees on item 1 of the Party and Party Bill of Costs.
  3. 3 Whether the taxing master failed to consider the applicant's submissions dated 29/1/2024.

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to proceed with the substantive determination of the reference application challenging the taxing master's decision, as there was a pending motion by the applicant's advocates to cease acting for the 5th defendant/respondent. The court held that the motion to cease acting must be heard and determined first, as it affects representation and the proper conduct of the proceedings. Accordingly, the court directed that the motion to cease acting be served and set down for inter partes hearing before any further steps are taken on the reference application.

Court Disposition

Reference application stood over pending determination of advocates' motion to cease acting.

Orders

  • The motion dated 5/11/2024 by the 5th defendant's advocates to cease acting shall be served upon the 5th respondent in person and the other respondents.
  • The motion to cease acting is to be set down for inter partes hearing on 2/04/2025.