[2021] KEBPRT 396 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the respondent had been properly served with the application, as evidenced by the affidavit of service and the process server's attempts to serve the respondent personally and by affixing the documents to the premises. The respondent did not oppose the application. The landlord demonstrated...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEBPRT 396 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Devinder Singh Matharu; Respondent: Steve Biko Okumu
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case E094 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Landlord's Application for Leave to Break Into Premises and Attach Goods
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Landlord Tenant Disputes, Rent Arrears, Distress for Rent, Eviction Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Devinder Singh Matharu
Applicant
Steve Biko Okumu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Landlord's Application for Leave to Break Into Premises and Attach Goods
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord is entitled to break into the suit premises to attach proclaimed goods for recovery of rent arrears.
- 2 Whether the landlord is entitled to vacant possession of the premises.
- 3 Whether service of the application on the tenant was proper.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent had been properly served with the application, as evidenced by the affidavit of service and the process server's attempts to serve the respondent personally and by affixing the documents to the premises. The respondent did not oppose the application. The landlord demonstrated that the tenant was in substantial rent arrears, had abandoned the premises, and that previous attempts to recover the arrears through auctioneers had failed due to the premises being locked. The Tribunal was satisfied that the landlord was entitled to break into the premises to attach the proclaimed goods for recovery of rent arrears, and to have the assistance of the police...
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part.
Orders
- Leave granted to the landlord to break into the suit premises and attach the proclaimed goods for recovery of rent arrears.
- The OCS Industrial Area Police Station, Area Chief, and Tribunal Officer to ensure compliance with the orders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
TRIBUNAL CASE NO E094 OF 2021 (NAIROBI)
DEVINDER SINGH MATHARU...........…………..…………LANDLORD/APPLICANT
VERSUS
STEVE BIKO OKUMU………………….……………………..TENANT/RESPONDENT
RULING
The Landlord’s application dated 29th April 2021 seeks the following orders;
1. Spent.
2. That the honourable Tribunal be pleased to grant leave to the “Plaintiff” Applicant to break into the suit premises and attach the proclaimed goods against the Defendants/Respondents in order to recover the outstanding arrears of Kshs 150,000/- as at March 2021.
3. That the honourable Tribunal be pleased to grant an order for vacant possession.
4. That the OCS Industrial Area Police Station/Area Chief/Tribunal Officer to ensure compliance with the orders.
5. Costs
6. Any other orders the Tribunal may deem necessary to grant.
The grounds upon which the application is brought and the affidavit in support thereof may be summarized as follows;
1. That the Respondent has been the Applicant’s Tenant on LR No. 209/9381/1 Godown No. 13 Lunga Lunga Road at a monthly rent of Kshs 50,000/-.
2. That the Tenant has for four months not been seen at the demised premises.
3. That the Tenant is in rent arrears amounting to Kshs 150,000as at March 2021.
4. That attempts by fantasy Auctioneers to collect the goods of the Tenant already proclaimed have been unsuccessful as the premises are locked.
5. That the Applicant is servicing a bank loan and risks losing the property for failure to remit monthly payments.
The application is not opposed. The Respondent has been served and the affidavit of service in proof of said service has been filed by one Robert Mutuku. The Process Server attempted to physically serve the Respondent a record five times to no avail. He had no choice but to pin the documents on the door of the demised premises. The Auctioneers have also indicated that they are unable to access the demised premises since they are continually locked. No one seems to know where the Tenant vanished to, including the watchman manning the gate. I am satisfied that service was proper.
In the circumstances, I allow the Landlord’s application in terms of prayer 2, 4 and 5 of the said application. Further, an inventory of the goods in the premises to be prepared by the Auctioneers in the presence of the Landlord and the OCS Industrial Area Police Station or his representative.
The Auctioneer is to file with the Tribunal an account of the sale of the proclaimed goods within seven days after the said sale (if any)
HON. CYPRIAN MUGAMBI NGUTHARI
CHAIRMAN
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
Ruling read and delivered virtually by Hon Cyprian Mugambi Ngutharithis 3rd day of August 2021in the absence of the parties.
HON. CYPRIAN MUGAMBI NGUTHARI
CHAIRMAN
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL