[2016] KEHC 6468 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 6468 (KLR)

The court found that liability had already been apportioned by consent at 85% against the defendants and 15% against the plaintiff. The court assessed the evidence, including medical reports and receipts, and determined that the plaintiff had suffered multiple serious injuries resulting in permanent disability and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 6468 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Devna Pandit; Defendant: Kennedy Otieno Obara; Defendant: Safaricom Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 494 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants.
Judges
LM Njuguna
Legal Topics
Personal Injury, Negligence, Assessment of Damages, Motor Vehicle Accident
Source Language
en
Tort Law Civil Procedure Personal Injury Negligence Assessment of Damages Motor Vehicle Accident

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Devna Pandit

Plaintiff

Kennedy Otieno Obara

Defendant

Safaricom Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendants were liable in negligence for the motor vehicle accident causing injury to the plaintiff.
  2. 2 What is the appropriate quantum of general and special damages to be awarded to the plaintiff for the injuries and losses sustained.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that liability had already been apportioned by consent at 85% against the defendants and 15% against the plaintiff. The court assessed the evidence, including medical reports and receipts, and determined that the plaintiff had suffered multiple serious injuries resulting in permanent disability and ongoing pain. The court found the plaintiff had specifically pleaded and proved special damages totaling Ksh.2,008,698, and that future medical expenses were justified by the medical evidence. In assessing general damages, the court considered comparable authorities, the severity of the plaintiff's injuries, and the likelihood of future complications, awarding Ksh.2,000,000. The...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants.

Orders

  • Plaintiff awarded special damages of Ksh.2,008,698/-.
  • Plaintiff awarded general damages for pain and suffering of Ksh.2,000,000/-.