[2022] KEHC 27036 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 27036 (KLR)

The court found that the parties had entered into a consent judgment in the trial court, agreeing on the settlement of the decretal sum by instalments and providing for execution in default. The consent was adopted as an order of the court and partially executed. The applicant did not demonstrate that the trial...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 27036 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Diamond Trust Kenya Ltd; Respondent: Philip Odiwuor Odunya (Suing as the legal representative of the estate of the late Jane Anyango Odiwuor); Respondent: Africa Merchant Assurance Company Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Homa Bay
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E035 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay Application Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Garnishee Orders, Consent Judgments, Decretal Sum Enforcement
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Banking and Finance Stay of Execution Garnishee Orders Consent Judgments Decretal Sum Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Diamond Trust Kenya Ltd

Appellant

Philip Odiwuor Odunya (Suing as the legal representative of the estate of the late Jane Anyango Odiwuor)

Respondent

Africa Merchant Assurance Company Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay Application Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the Garnishee Order Absolute pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the existence of a consent judgment between the parties precludes the grant of stay.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient cause for stay under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the parties had entered into a consent judgment in the trial court, agreeing on the settlement of the decretal sum by instalments and providing for execution in default. The consent was adopted as an order of the court and partially executed. The applicant did not demonstrate that the trial court erred or that sufficient cause existed to warrant a stay of execution. The issues now raised could have been canvassed in the trial court. In view of the binding consent and part execution, the application for stay lacked merit and was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application for stay of execution is dismissed with costs.